Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32186961›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020

Determinants of vaccine hesitancy and effectiveness of vaccination counseling interventions among a sample of the general population in Palermo, Italy.

Claudio Costantino, Francesca Caracci, Mariarosa Brandi, Stefania Enza Bono, Antonio Ferro, Claudia Emilia Sannasardo, Francesco Scarpitta, Andrea Siddu, Carlotta Vella, Gianmarco Ventura and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The effects of the COVID 19 pandemic on vaccine decisions in pregnant women.Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives · 2022
    Article
  11. Experts' Opinion for Improving Pertussis Vaccination Rates in Adolescents and Adults: A Call to Action.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Second Edition of Special Issue "Strategies and Evidence in Health Communication: Evidence and Perspectives".International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Claudio CostantinoDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3397-7331
Francesca CaracciDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.
Mariarosa BrandiDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.
Stefania Enza BonoDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.
Antonio FerroPrevention Department, AULSS 6 Euganea , Padova, Italy.
Claudia Emilia SannasardoDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.
Francesco ScarpittaDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2339-1115
Andrea SidduPrevention Department, APSS Trento , Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8212-3538
Carlotta VellaDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.
Gianmarco VenturaDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.
Francesco VitaleDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6354-8060
Alessandra CasuccioDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.
Vincenzo RestivoDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5406-884X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Counteract vaccine hesitancy is a public health priority. Main objectives of the cross-sectional study conducted were to evaluate knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding vaccination issues, to estimate the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy and to estimate the effectiveness of vaccination counseling on community advocacy in a sample of general population. An anonymous validated questionnaire was administered in April 2017 at the main shopping center of Palermo and was followed by tailored vaccination counseling interventions. To estimate the effectiveness of the interventions four main connection parameters to the vaccinarsi.org website were evaluated, in the two months before and after the intervention and in the two months before the intervention compared with the same period of previous and following years. Among the 299 subject enrolled 12.7% were hesitant about vaccinations, and 4.7% declared being against vaccinations. General practitioners (GPs) and pediatricians were the most affordable source of information about vaccinations. A higher probability of vaccination hesitancy/refusal was reported among subjects who considered "alternative strategies" the best way for the prevention of infectious diseases (adj-OR = 7.01, IC95% 2.88-17.09,

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeVaccinesCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesHumansItalyPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccination RefusalVaccinesgeneral populationhealth advocacyinternet traffic indicatorsvaccination confidencevaccination counselingVaccine hesitancyweb search

Identifiers

PMID32186961
PMCPMC7644245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.