Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32186716›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Coupled matrix-matrix and coupled tensor-matrix completion methods for predicting drug-target interactions.

Maryam Bagherian, Renaid B Kim, Cheng Jiang, Maureen A Sartor, Harm Derksen, Kayvan Najarian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AΙ-Driven Drug Repurposing: Applications and Challenges.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maryam Bagherian
Renaid B Kim
Cheng Jiang
Maureen A Sartor
Harm Derksen
Kayvan Najarian

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the interactions between drugs and targets plays an important role in the process of new drug discovery, drug repurposing (also known as drug repositioning). There is a need to develop novel and efficient prediction approaches in order to avoid the costly and laborious process of determining drug-target interactions (DTIs) based on experiments alone. These computational prediction approaches should be capable of identifying the potential DTIs in a timely manner. Matrix factorization methods have been proven to be the most reliable group of methods. Here, we first propose a matrix factorization-based method termed 'Coupled Matrix-Matrix Completion' (CMMC). Next, in order to utilize more comprehensive information provided in different databases and incorporate multiple types of scores for drug-drug similarities and target-target relationship, we then extend CMMC to 'Coupled Tensor-Matrix Completion' (CTMC) by considering drug-drug and target-target similarity/interaction tensors. Results: Evaluation on two benchmark datasets, DrugBank and TTD, shows that CTMC outperforms the matrix-factorization-based methods: GRMF, $L_{2,1}$-GRMF, NRLMF and NRLMF$\beta $. Based on the evaluation, CMMC and CTMC outperform the above three methods in term of area under the curve, F1 score, sensitivity and specificity in a considerably shorter run time.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDrug DevelopmentDrug InteractionsHumanscoupled matrix–matrixcoupled matrix–tensordrug–target interactionmatrix completionmatrix factorization

Identifiers

PMID32186716
PMCPMC7986629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.