Trial reportJAMA dermatology2020
Factors Associated With Short-term Relapse in Patients With Pemphigus Who Receive Rituximab as First-line Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00784589 (Comparison Between Monoclonal Antibody CD20 Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison Between Monoclonal Antibody CD20 Treatment (Rituximab (mabthéra))and General Corticotherapy Treatment in Patients With Pemphigus
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparability of Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Pharmacological Interventions for Pemphigus Vulgaris and Pemphigus Foliaceus: A Systematic Mapping Review.Advances in therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Cutaneous, skin histopathological manifestations and relationship to COVID-19 infection patients.Dermatologic therapy · 2020Pooled it
- FcRn Antagonism Leads to a Decrease of Desmoglein-Specific B Cells: Secondary Analysis of a Phase 2 Study of Efgartigimod in Pemphigus Vulgaris and Pemphigus Foliaceus.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Trial
- Emerging Treatments in Pemphigus: Is Healing an Achievable Goal?American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Eight Years of Follow-Up of Rituximab in Pemphigus Vulgaris and Foliaceus at a Single Center: Assessing Efficacy and Safety in Light of Several Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Antidesmoglein 1 and 3 serum IgG and positivity by direct immunofluorescence microscopy is associated with relapse in pemphigus in a prospective bicontinental study.JAAD international · 2025Article
- Prognostic Factors Predicting Remission Following Rituximab Therapy for Pemphigus Vulgaris.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- The effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: a cohort study based on a registry database.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Clinical correlation of anti-desmoglein antibody dynamics in pemphigus treated with rituximab.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Pemphigus relapse: Mechanisms, risk factors, and agents associated with disease recurrence.The Journal of dermatology · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Faster IgG4 Depletion Kinetics Observed for Anti-Desmoglein 3 Autoantibodies Following Rituximab Treatment in Patients with Pemphigus Vulgaris.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2022Article
- IgGBiomedicines · 2022Article
- How to decrease systemic corticosteroids in pemphigus patients under rituximab.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Temporal Outcomes after Rituximab Therapy for Pemphigus Vulgaris.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2022Article
- The Diversity of Serum Anti-DSG3 IgG Subclasses Has a Major Impact on Pemphigus Activity and Is Predictive of Relapses After Treatment With Rituximab.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Cutaneous manifestations in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or COVID-19: what do we know after 10 months under this pandemic?International journal of dermatology · 2022Review
- IgG4 Autoantibodies in Organ-Specific Autoimmunopathies: Reviewing Class Switching, Antibody-Producing Cells, and Specific Immunotherapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Modifications of the BAFF/BAFF-Receptor Axis in Patients With Pemphigus Treated With Rituximab Versus Standard Corticosteroid Regimen.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Rituximab and short-term corticosteroid therapy are the criterion standard treatments for patients with newly diagnosed moderate to severe pemphigus. Objective: To examine factors associated with short-term relapse in patients with pemphigus treated with rituximab. Design, Setting, and Participants: This post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial (Comparison Between Rituximab Treatment and Oral Corticosteroid Treatment in Patients With Pemphigus [RITUX 3]) conducted from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015, included patients from 20 dermatology departments of tertiary care centers in France from the RITUX 3 trial and 3 newly diagnosed patients treated according to the trial protocol. Data analysis was performed from February 1 to June 30, 2019. Exposure: Patients randomly assigned to the rituximab group in the RITUX 3 trial and the 3 additional patients were treated with 1000 mg of intravenous rituximab on days 0 and 14 and 500 mg at months 12 and 18 combined with a short-term prednisone regimen. Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline (pretreatment) clinical and biological characteristics (Pemphigus Disease Area Index [PDAI] score, ranging from 0-250 points, with higher values indicating more severe disease) and changes in anti-desmoglein (DSG) 1 and anti-DSG3 values as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay during the 3 months after rituximab treatment were compared between patients with disease relapse and those who maintained clinical remission during the first 12 months after treatment. The positive and negative predictive values of these factors were calculated. Results: Among 47 patients (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [17.0] years; 17 [36%] male and 30 [64%] female) included in the study, the mean (SD) baseline PDAI score for patients with relapsing disease was higher than that of the patients with nonrelapsing disease (54 [33] vs 28 [24]; P = .03). At month 3, 7 of 11 patients with relapsing disease (64%) vs 7 of 36 patients with nonrelapsing disease (19%) had persistent anti-DSG1 antibody values of 20 IU/mL or higher and/or anti-DSG3 antibody values of 130 IU/mL or higher (P = .01). A PDAI score of 45 or higher defining severe pemphigus and/or persistent anti-DSG1 antibody values of 20 IU/mL or higher and/or anti-DSG3 antibody values of 130 IU/mL or higher at month 3 provided a positive predictive value of 50% (95% CI, 27%-73%) and a negative predictive value of 94% (95% CI, 73%-100%) for the occurrence of relapse after rituximab. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that initial PDAI score and changes in anti-DSG antibody values after the initial cycle of rituximab might help differentiate a subgroup of patients with high risk of relapse who might benefit from maintenance rituximab infusion at month 6 from a subgroup of patients with low risk of relapse who do not need early maintenance therapy. Trial Registration: NCT00784589.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.