Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32186656›Full record

Trial reportJAMA dermatology2020

Factors Associated With Short-term Relapse in Patients With Pemphigus Who Receive Rituximab as First-line Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Claire Mignard, Maud Maho-Vaillant, Marie-Laure Golinski, Pierre Balayé, Catherine Prost-Squarcioni, Estelle Houivet, Sé Bastien Calbo, Bruno Labeille, Catherine Picard-Dahan, Maria Polina Konstantinou and 28 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00784589 (Comparison Between Monoclonal Antibody CD20 Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00784589 phase3completednot on this map

Comparison Between Monoclonal Antibody CD20 Treatment (Rituximab (mabthéra))and General Corticotherapy Treatment in Patients With Pemphigus

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, RouenRan2009 to 2016Enrolled90ConditionsPemphigus DiseaseArmsGeneral Corticotherapy, Rituximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Emerging Treatments in Pemphigus: Is Healing an Achievable Goal?American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. IgGBiomedicines · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Temporal Outcomes after Rituximab Therapy for Pemphigus Vulgaris.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire MignardCentre de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes, Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, INSERM U1234, Rouen, France.
Maud Maho-VaillantCentre de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes, Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, INSERM U1234, Rouen, France.
Marie-Laure GolinskiCentre de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes, Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, INSERM U1234, Rouen, France.
Pierre BalayéDepartment of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Catherine Prost-SquarcioniCentre de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes, Avicenne Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Dermatology, University of Paris 13, Bobigny, France.
Estelle HouivetDepartment of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Sé Bastien CalboCentre de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes, Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, INSERM U1234, Rouen, France.
Bruno LabeilleDepartment of Dermatology, University of Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France.
Catherine Picard-DahanDepartment of Dermatology, Bichat Hospital, University of Paris X, Paris, France.
Maria Polina KonstantinouDepartment of Dermatology, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Guillaume ChabyDepartment of Dermatology, University of Amiens, Amiens, France.
Marie-Aleth RichardAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Department of Dermatology, Aix Marseille University, UMR 911, INSERM CRO2, Marseille, France.
Jean-David BouazizDepartment of Dermatology, St Louis Hospital, Paris 7 Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
Sophie Duvert-LehembreDepartment of Dermatology, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Emmanuel DelaporteDepartment of Dermatology, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Philippe BernardDepartment of Dermatology, University of Reims, Reims, France.
Frédéric CauxCentre de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes, Avicenne Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Dermatology, University of Paris 13, Bobigny, France.
Marina AlexandreCentre de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes, Avicenne Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Dermatology, University of Paris 13, Bobigny, France.
Saskia Ingen-Housz-OroDepartment of Dermatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.
Pierre VabresDepartment of Dermatology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Gaëlle QuereuxDepartment of Dermatology, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Alain DupuyDepartment of Dermatology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Sébastien DebarbieuxDepartment of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, Lyon, France.
Martine Avenel-AudranDepartment of Dermatology, University of Angers, Angers, France.
Michel D'IncanDepartment of Dermatology, University of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Christophe BédaneDepartment of Dermatology, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
Nathalie BénétonDepartment of Dermatology, Le Mans General Hospital, Le Mans, France.
Denis JullienDepartment of Dermatology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.
Nicolas DupinDepartment of Dermatology, University of Paris V, Paris, France.
Laurent MiseryDepartment of Dermatology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Laurent MachetDepartment of Dermatology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.
Marie Beylot-BarryDepartment of Dermatology, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Olivier DereureDepartment of Dermatology, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Bruno SassolasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Jacques BenichouDepartment of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Pascal JolyCentre de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes, Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, INSERM U1234, Rouen, France.
Vivien HébertCentre de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes, Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, INSERM U1234, Rouen, France.
French Study Group on Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRUniversité de Lille · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRCentre Hospitalier du Mans · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRHôpital Lyon Sud · FRImmunité et Cancer · FRMaison des Sciences de l’Homme de Dijon · FRNantes Université · FRNormandie Université · FRService de la Santé Publique · CHUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de Limoges · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Rituximab and short-term corticosteroid therapy are the criterion standard treatments for patients with newly diagnosed moderate to severe pemphigus. Objective: To examine factors associated with short-term relapse in patients with pemphigus treated with rituximab. Design, Setting, and Participants: This post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial (Comparison Between Rituximab Treatment and Oral Corticosteroid Treatment in Patients With Pemphigus [RITUX 3]) conducted from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015, included patients from 20 dermatology departments of tertiary care centers in France from the RITUX 3 trial and 3 newly diagnosed patients treated according to the trial protocol. Data analysis was performed from February 1 to June 30, 2019. Exposure: Patients randomly assigned to the rituximab group in the RITUX 3 trial and the 3 additional patients were treated with 1000 mg of intravenous rituximab on days 0 and 14 and 500 mg at months 12 and 18 combined with a short-term prednisone regimen. Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline (pretreatment) clinical and biological characteristics (Pemphigus Disease Area Index [PDAI] score, ranging from 0-250 points, with higher values indicating more severe disease) and changes in anti-desmoglein (DSG) 1 and anti-DSG3 values as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay during the 3 months after rituximab treatment were compared between patients with disease relapse and those who maintained clinical remission during the first 12 months after treatment. The positive and negative predictive values of these factors were calculated. Results: Among 47 patients (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [17.0] years; 17 [36%] male and 30 [64%] female) included in the study, the mean (SD) baseline PDAI score for patients with relapsing disease was higher than that of the patients with nonrelapsing disease (54 [33] vs 28 [24]; P = .03). At month 3, 7 of 11 patients with relapsing disease (64%) vs 7 of 36 patients with nonrelapsing disease (19%) had persistent anti-DSG1 antibody values of 20 IU/mL or higher and/or anti-DSG3 antibody values of 130 IU/mL or higher (P = .01). A PDAI score of 45 or higher defining severe pemphigus and/or persistent anti-DSG1 antibody values of 20 IU/mL or higher and/or anti-DSG3 antibody values of 130 IU/mL or higher at month 3 provided a positive predictive value of 50% (95% CI, 27%-73%) and a negative predictive value of 94% (95% CI, 73%-100%) for the occurrence of relapse after rituximab. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that initial PDAI score and changes in anti-DSG antibody values after the initial cycle of rituximab might help differentiate a subgroup of patients with high risk of relapse who might benefit from maintenance rituximab infusion at month 6 from a subgroup of patients with low risk of relapse who do not need early maintenance therapy. Trial Registration: NCT00784589.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAutoantibodiesDesmoglein 3Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsMaleMiddle AgedPemphigusPredictive Value of TestsPrednisoneRecurrenceRituximabSeverity of Illness IndexAutoantibodiesDesmoglein 3Immunologic FactorsPrednisoneRituximab

Identifiers

PMID32186656
PMCPMC7081151
OpenAlexW3012132918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.