Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32186515›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Temporal cascade of frontal, motor and muscle processes underlying human action-stopping.

Sumitash Jana, Ricci Hannah, Vignesh Muralidharan, Adam R Aron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Brain-computer interface-based neurofeedback training enables transferable control of cortical state switching in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stopping Muscle Contractions and Relaxations during Action Inhibition Involves Global and Targeted Control Dependent on Muscle State.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Global Motor System Suppression as the Primary Mechanism of Human Action Stopping: Challenging the Pause-Then-Cancel Model.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Common and Unique Neurophysiological Processes That Support the Stopping and Revising of Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Does the stop-signal P3 reflect inhibitory control?Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sumitash Jana *Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3742-3958
Ricci Hannah *Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5379-3292
Vignesh MuralidharanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, United States.
Adam R AronDepartment of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, United States.
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

How inhibitory control prevents thought intrusions and sensory and motor provocationsR01DA026452 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ARON, ADAM ROBERT · 2009 to 2021
$4.0M
Stopping behavior and interrupting cognition via subthalamic nucleusR01NS106822 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ARON, ADAM ROBERT, HNASKO, THOMAS · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026452NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action-stopping is a canonical executive function thought to involve top-down control over the motor system. Here we aimed to validate this stopping system using high temporal resolution methods in humans. We show that, following the requirement to stop, there was an increase of right frontal beta (~13 to 30 Hz) at ~120 ms, likely a proxy of right inferior frontal gyrus; then, at 140 ms, there was a broad skeletomotor suppression, likely reflecting the impact of the subthalamic nucleus on basal ganglia output; then, at ~160 ms, suppression was detected in the muscle, and, finally, the behavioral time of stopping was ~220 ms. This temporal cascade supports a physiological model of action-stopping, and partitions it into subprocesses that are isolable to different nodes and are more precise than the behavioral latency of stopping. Variation in these subprocesses, including at the single-trial level, could better explain individual differences in impulse control.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalPsychomotor PerformanceBrain MappingCuesElectroencephalographyElectromyographyExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor CortexMusclesbeta burstelectromyographyhumanneurosciencepartial responsesingle trial metricstop signal taskvariability

Identifiers

PMID32186515
PMCPMC7159878
OpenAlexW3011883915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.