Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32186411›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health perspectives2020

Metal/Metalloid Levels in Electronic Cigarette Liquids, Aerosols, and Human Biosamples: A Systematic Review.

Di Zhao, Atul Aravindakshan, Markus Hilpert, Pablo Olmedo, Ana M Rule, Ana Navas-Acien, Angela Aherrera

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Biomarkers of Exposure to Tobacco-Related Toxicants among Adult Nicotine Pouch Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pulmonary fibrosis: from mechanisms to therapies.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Di ZhaoDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Atul AravindakshanDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Markus HilpertDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Pablo OlmedoDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Ana M RuleDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ana Navas-AcienDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Angela AherreraDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Steven N. Chillrud · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
Multidisciplinary Training Program in Pediatric PulmonaryT32HL072748 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Joseph Michael Collaco · 2003 to 2026
$6.1M
The Exposure to Metals from E-Cigarettes (EMIT) StudyR01ES030025 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RULE, ANA MARIA · 2018 to 2020
$1.5M
Tracking Metals From E-cigarettes: From The Coil Into Lung TissueR21ES029777 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HILPERT, MARKUS, KLEIMAN, NORMAN J · 2018 to 2019
$438k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL072748NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030025NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES029777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have become popular, in part because they are perceived as a safer alternative to tobacco cigarettes. An increasing number of studies, however, have found toxic metals/metalloids in e-cigarette emissions.

objectiveWe summarized the evidence on metal/metalloid levels in e-cigarette liquid (e-liquid), aerosols, and biosamples of e-cigarette users across e-cigarette device systems to evaluate metal/metalloid exposure levels for e-cigarette users and the potential implications on health outcomes.

methodsWe searched PubMed/TOXLINE, Embase®, and Web of Science for studies on metals/metalloids in e-liquid, e-cigarette aerosols, and biosamples of e-cigarette users. For metal/metalloid levels in e-liquid and aerosol samples, we collected the mean and standard deviation (SD) if these values were reported, derived mean and SD by using automated software to infer them if data were reported in a figure, or calculated the overall mean (mean ± SD) if data were reported only for separate groups. Metal/metalloid levels in e-liquids and aerosols were converted and reported in micrograms per kilogram and nanograms per puff, respectively, for easy comparison.

resultsWe identified 24 studies on metals/metalloids in e-liquid, e-cigarette aerosols, and human biosamples of e-cigarette users. Metal/metalloid levels, including aluminum, antimony, arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, nickel, selenium, tin, and zinc, were present in e-cigarette samples in the studies reviewed. Twelve studies reported metal/metalloid levels in e-liquids (bottles, cartridges, open wick, and tank), 12 studies reported metal/metalloid levels in e-cigarette aerosols (from cig-a-like and tank devices), and 4 studies reported metal/metalloid levels in human biosamples (urine, saliva, serum, and blood) of e-cigarette users. Metal/metalloid levels showed substantial heterogeneity depending on sample type, source of e-liquid, and device type. Metal/metalloid levels in e-liquid from cartridges or tank/open wicks were higher than those from bottles, possibly due to coil contact. Most metal/metalloid levels found in biosamples of e-cigarette users were similar or higher than levels found in biosamples of conventional cigarette users, and even higher than those found in biosamples of cigar users.

conclusionE-cigarettes are a potential source of exposure to metals/metalloids. Differences in collection methods and puffing regimes likely contribute to the variability in metal/metalloid levels across studies, making comparison across studies difficult. Standardized protocols for the quantification of metal/metalloid levels from e-cigarette samples are needed. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5686.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAerosolsHumansMetalloidsMetalsSalivaAerosolsMetalloidsMetals

Identifiers

PMID32186411
PMCPMC7137911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.