Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32185641›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2020

Psychometric evaluation of the Pinocchio Illusion Questionnaire.

John R Purcell, John Chen, Alexandra B Moussa-Tooks, William P Hetrick

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John R PurcellDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN, 47408, USA.
John ChenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN, 47408, USA.
Alexandra B Moussa-TooksDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN, 47408, USA.
William P HetrickDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN, 47408, USA. whetrick@indiana.edu.

Funding

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Cerebellar timing dysfunction in schizophreniaR01MH074983 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HETRICK, WILLIAM P · 2006 to 2016
$3.6M
Training in Clinical Translational Science: Maximizing the Public Health ImpactT32MH103213 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM P HETRICK · 2015 to 2026
$3.4M
Cerebellar biobehavioral markers in cannabis usersR01DA048012 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HETRICK, WILLIAM P · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002531 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI FOTI, DANIEL JUSTIN, HURLEY, THOMAS D. · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteTL1TR001107 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
Cerebellar Dysfunction in AutismR21MH118617 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HETRICK, WILLIAM P · 2019 to 2020
$433k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001107NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002531NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048012NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074983NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH118617NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH103213NIMH NIH HHS UL1TR001108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceived nose elongation resulting from vibratory stimulation to the bicep brachii tendon in the absence of visual input while the finger is touching the nose, known as the Pinocchio Illusion (PI), is used to investigate how afferent signals can contribute to aberrant top-down perception of body representation. The Pinocchio Illusion Questionnaire (PIQ) was developed to empirically quantify PI perception, allowing for external validation of the PI with psychologically relevant phenomenon. The current study (N = 60) examined the PIQ's test-retest reliability, internal consistency, factor structure, and correlations with self-reported interoceptive awareness and schizotypal traits. The PIQ demonstrated strong test-retest reliability and internal validity; however, a Principal Component Analysis did not yield a latent variable structure that distinguished PI-specific perceptual aberrations from unrelated or contradictory perceptual experiences. Additionally, decreased reports of PI-specific perceptual aberrations during two elicitations of the PI on the PIQ's open-ended free-response section (percent of sample endorsement = 5% (first elicitation); 8.3% (second elicitation)) compared to its 11-item section (endorsement of PI-specific items ranging 30-53.33% (first)]; 31.67-46.67% (second)) suggest that these responses may be heavily influenced by demand characteristics rather than accurately capturing PI perception. Therefore, further psychometric development of the PIQ and standardization of procedures to elicit the illusion are recommended.

Indexed as

IllusionsBody ImageHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBodily illusionEmbodied perceptionHapticsPinocchio IllusionProprioceptionSchizotypy

Identifiers

PMID32185641
PMCPMC7351597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.