Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32185605›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

Impact of chemotherapy schedule modification on breast cancer patients: a single-centre retrospective study.

Gobi Hariyanayagam Gunasekaran, Mohamed Azmi Bin Ahmad Hassali, Wan Mohd Akmal Bin Wan Sabri, Muhammad Tahar Bin Rahman

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Body mass index and patient-reported function, quality of life and treatment toxicity in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gobi Hariyanayagam GunasekaranOncology Pharmacy, Hospital Seri Manjung, 32040 Seri Manjung, Perak, Malaysia. gobi_hari@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-9284
Mohamed Azmi Bin Ahmad HassaliDiscipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, 18000, Minden, Penang, Malaysia.
Wan Mohd Akmal Bin Wan SabriOncology Pharmacy, Hospital Seri Manjung, 32040 Seri Manjung, Perak, Malaysia.
Muhammad Tahar Bin RahmanSurgical Department, Hospital Seri Manjung, 32040 Seri Manjung, Perak, Malaysia.
Serdang Hospital · MYUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Nonconformity to chemotherapy schedules is common in clinical practice. Multiple clinical studies have established the negative prognostic impact of dose delay on survival outcome. Objective This study investigated the prevalence and reason for chemotherapy schedule modifications of breast cancer patients. This study also investigated the impact of schedule modifications on overall survival (OS). Setting This retrospective cohort study was done among breast cancer patient receiving chemotherapy from 2013 to 2017 and patients were followed until 31 Dec 2018. Methods Medical records of patients with cancer were reviewed. Female patients over eighteen years old were included, with primary carcinoma of the breast, who received anthracycline or taxane based chemotherapy regime and completed more than two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients were categorized into three groups of (1) no schedule modification, (2) with schedule modification and (3) incomplete schedule. The Kaplan-Meier was used to test for survival differences in the univariate setting and Cox regression model was used in the multivariate setting. Main outcome measure Prevalence, overall survival rates and hazard ratio of three schedule group Results Among 171 patient who were included in the final analysis, 28 (16.4%) had no schedule modification, 118 (69.0%) with schedule modification and 25 (14.6%) had incomplete schedule with OS of 75.0%, 59.3% and 52.0% respectively. 94% (189) of all cycle rescheduling happened because of constitutional symptoms (70), for non-medical reasons (61) and blood/bone marrow toxicity (58). When compared to patients with no schedule modification, patients with schedule modification had a 2.34-times higher risk of death (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.03-5.32; p = 0.043). Conclusion Nonconformity to the chemotherapy schedule is common in clinical practice because of treatment complications, patients' social schedule conflicts, and facility administrative reasons. Cumulative delays of ≥ 14 days are likely to have negative prognostic effect on patient survival. Thus, the duration of the delays between cycles should be reduced whenever possible to achieve the maximum chemotherapeutic benefit.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerChemotherapyHazard ratioOverall survivalSchedule modification

Identifiers

PMID32185605
OpenAlexW3011240851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.