ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2020
A genetic and immunological comparison of tick-resistance in beef cattle following artificial infestation with Rhipicephalus ticks.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive evaluation of tick infestation dynamics and host response in Kankrej and Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of piroplasmosis resistance in Yunnan humped cattle.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genomic signals on the X chromosome reveal local adaptations in Ethiopian cattle.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Blood plasma proteomics for detecting potential biomarkers for tick resistance in a tropically adapted beef cattle breed.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Dietary Fermentation withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Exploring the biological responses involved in the genetic resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus in Argentine Creole cattle.Tropical animal health and production · 2024Article
- Ecto- and endoparasites of common reedbuck,Parasitology · 2024Article
- Application of quantitative proteomics to discover biomarkers for tick resistance in cattle.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Transcriptional changes in the peripheral blood leukocytes from Brangus cattle before and after tick challenge with Rhipicephalus australis.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Genome variation in tick infestation and cryptic divergence in Tunisian indigenous sheep.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Proteomic profiling of plasma-derived small extracellular vesicles: a novel tool for understanding the systemic effects of tick burden in cattle.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Differentially Expressed Extracellular Vesicle, Exosome and Non-Exosome miRNA Profile in High and Low Tick-Resistant Beef Cattle.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases in Cuba, Half a Century of Scientific Research.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Host resistance to ticks can be explored as a possible approach of combating tick infestations to complement the existing unsustainable tick control methods. Thirty-six beef cattle animals were used, consisting of Angus, Brahman and Nguni breeds, with each breed contributing 12 animals. Half of the animals per breed were artificially challenged with Rhipicephalus microplus and the other half with R. decoloratus unfed larvae per animal. Skin biopsies and blood samples were collected pre-infestation and 12 h post-infestation from the feeding sites of visibly engorging ticks. The success rate of the ticks was high and had an influence even at the early time point. Increased lymphocytes and blood urea nitrogen levels as well as decreased levels of segmented neutrophils were observed in the Angus, which were the opposite of those in the Brahman and Nguni. The increase in cholesterol, which was highest in the Angus and lowest in the Nguni, may be due to altered protein metabolism. The expression profiles of genes TRAF6, TBP, LUM and B2M were significantly different among breeds. Five genes (CCR1, TLR5, TRAF6, TBP, BDA20) had increased or constant expression post-infestation, whereas the expression of CXCL8, IL-10 and TNF-α decreased or remained the same after tick challenge. Genes that showed variation are involved in discouraging long-term supply of blood meal to the tick and those associated with immune responses. The gene LUM is a potential biomarker for tick resistance in cattle. The response to infestation by the breeds was consistent across the tick species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.