ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2020
[Antiphospholipid syndrome : Update on diagnostics and management].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was first identified in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and frequent occurrence of thromboembolic complications and miscarriages accompanied by detection of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). When APS was also later found without an underlying SLE, the so-called primary APS was distinguished from its secondary form with SLE. Even more specific than aCL are the lupus anticoagulant (LA) and antibodies against beta‑2 glycoprotein I (aB2GP I). In recent years, it has become evident that the risk of (further) thromboembolic and obstetric complications is markedly increased if all three serological criteria of APS (aCL, aB2GP I and LA), the so-called triple positivity, are present (high-risk profile). Immunosuppression is not effective in preventing further thromboembolic complications of APS. Low-dose aspirin (LDA), heparin and vitamin K antagonists are used in primary and secondary prophylaxis. The direct oral anticoagulants have an increased risk of complications compared to these treatments and should not be used in cases of high-risk APS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.