Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32185445›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2020

PI-RADS: what is new and how to use it.

Silvina P Dutruel, Sunil Jeph, Daniel J A Margolis, Natasha Wehrli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. PI-RADSv2.1: Current status.Turkish journal of urology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvina P DutruelDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian, 525 E 68th St, Box 141, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1335-621X
Sunil JephDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian, 525 E 68th St, Box 141, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8403-6814
Daniel J A MargolisDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian, 525 E 68th St, Box 141, New York, NY, 10065, USA. djm9016@med.cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-707X
Natasha WehrliDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian, 525 E 68th St, Box 141, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6962-9005
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) has revolutionized the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the management of prostate cancer (PCa). The most recent version 2.1, PI-RADS v2.1, provides specific refinements in the performance, relaxing some recommendations which were not found to be helpful, while reinforcing and clarifying others. The interpretation of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) in the transition zone (TZ), and the overall assessment of TZ nodules, now allows for a clearer distinction between those which are clearly benign and those which might warrant tissue sampling. Additional changes also resolve discrepancies in T2WI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the peripheral zone (PZ). PI-RADS v2.1 is a simpler, more straightforward, and more reproducible method to better communicate between physicians regarding findings on prostate MRI.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAssessmentCancerMRIPI-RADSProstateReporting

Identifiers

PMID32185445
OpenAlexW3011677935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.