Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32185437›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2020

Secular trends in the initiation of therapy in secondary fracture prevention in Europe: a multi-national cohort study including data from Denmark, Catalonia, and the United Kingdom.

M K Skjødt, S Khalid, M Ernst, K H Rubin, D Martinez-Laguna, A Delmestri, M K Javaid, C Cooper, C Libanati, E Toth and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The impact of fracture liaison services on subsequent fractures and mortality: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Mental disorders and osteoporosis treatment in patients with hip fracture-a Danish population-based cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  5. Fracture trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2021.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. A novel fracture liaison service using digital health: impact on mortality in hospitalized elderly osteoporotic fracture patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Assessment and management of imminent fracture risk in the setting of the fracture liaison service.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Epidemiology and reporting of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in patients with long-term hospital records based on routine clinical CT imaging.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Perspectives of patients with depression and chronic pain about bone health after a fragility fracture: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Prediction of imminent fracture risk in Canadian women and men aged 45 years or older: external validation of the Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

M K SkjødtDepartment of Medicine, Hospital of Holbaek, Holbaek, Region Zealand, Denmark.
S KhalidNuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, England.
M ErnstOPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
K H RubinOPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
D Martinez-LagunaGREMPAL Research Group, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), CIBERFES, Barcelona, Spain.
A DelmestriNuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, England.
M K JavaidNuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, England.
C CooperNuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, England.
C LibanatiUCB Pharma, Anderlecht, Belgium.
E TothUCB Pharma, Anderlecht, Belgium.
B AbrahamsenDepartment of Medicine, Hospital of Holbaek, Holbaek, Region Zealand, Denmark. b.abrahamsen@physician.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2730-6080
D Prieto-AlhambraNuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, England.

Funding

Department of Health 10/33/04Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a large post-fracture anti-osteoporosis treatment gap in the period 2005 to 2015. The gap was stable in Denmark at around 88-90%, increased in Catalonia from 80 to 88%, and started to increase in the UK towards the end of our study. Improved post-fracture care is needed.

introductionPatients experiencing a fragility fracture are at high risk of subsequent fractures, particularly within the first 2 years after the fracture. Previous studies have demonstrated that only a small proportion of fracture patients initiate therapy with an anti-osteoporotic medication (AOM), despite the proven fracture risk reduction of such therapies. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the changes in this post-fracture treatment gap across three different countries from 2005 to 2015.

methodsThis analysis, which is part of a multinational cohort study, included men and women, aged 50 years or older, sustaining a first incident fragility fracture. Using routinely collected patient data from three administrative health databases covering Catalonia, Denmark, and the United Kingdom, we estimated the treatment gap as the proportion of patients not treated with AOM within 1 year of their first incident fracture.

resultsA total of 648,369 fracture patients were included. Mean age 70.2-78.9 years; 22.2-31.7% were men. In Denmark, the treatment gap was stable at approximately 88-90% throughout the 2005 to 2015 time period. In Catalonia, the treatment gap increased from 80 to 88%. In the UK, an initially decreasing treatment gap-though never smaller than 63%-was replaced by an increasing gap towards the end of our study. The gap was more pronounced in men than in women.

conclusionDespite repeated calls for improved secondary fracture prevention, an unacceptably large treatment gap remains, with time trends indicating that the problem may be getting worse in recent years.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporotic FracturesAgedCohort StudiesDenmarkEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpainUnited KingdomBone Density Conservation AgentsFracture preventionHealth Services Research

Identifiers

PMID32185437
PMCPMC7360649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.