Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32185395›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2020

Text mining meets community curation: a newly designed curation platform to improve author experience and participation at WormBase.

Valerio Arnaboldi, Daniela Raciti, Kimberly Van Auken, Juancarlos N Chan, Hans-Michael Müller, Paul W Sternberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Working in biocuration: contemporary experiences and perspectives.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A roadmap for the functional annotation of protein families: a community perspective.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valerio ArnaboldiDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering 156-29, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Daniela RacitiDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering 156-29, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Kimberly Van AukenDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering 156-29, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Juancarlos N ChanDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering 156-29, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Hans-Michael MüllerDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering 156-29, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Paul W SternbergDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering 156-29, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Funding

Text mining in the CloudU24HG010859 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CAROL J BULT, PAUL Warren STERNBERG · 2019 to 2026
$42.0M
WormBase: a core data resource for C. elegans and other nematodesU24HG002223 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TIM SCHEDL, PAUL Warren STERNBERG · 2018 to 2026
$18.9M
Curation at scale: Integrating AI into community curationR01LM013871 · NLM · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STERNBERG, PAUL WARREN · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG002223NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG010859NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological knowledgebases rely on expert biocuration of the research literature to maintain up-to-date collections of data organized in machine-readable form. To enter information into knowledgebases, curators need to follow three steps: (i) identify papers containing relevant data, a process called triaging; (ii) recognize named entities; and (iii) extract and curate data in accordance with the underlying data models. WormBase (WB), the authoritative repository for research data on Caenorhabditis elegans and other nematodes, uses text mining (TM) to semi-automate its curation pipeline. In addition, WB engages its community, via an Author First Pass (AFP) system, to help recognize entities and classify data types in their recently published papers. In this paper, we present a new WB AFP system that combines TM and AFP into a single application to enhance community curation. The system employs string-searching algorithms and statistical methods (e.g. support vector machines (SVMs)) to extract biological entities and classify data types, and it presents the results to authors in a web form where they validate the extracted information, rather than enter it de novo as the previous form required. With this new system, we lessen the burden for authors, while at the same time receive valuable feedback on the performance of our TM tools. The new user interface also links out to specific structured data submission forms, e.g. for phenotype or expression pattern data, giving the authors the opportunity to contribute a more detailed curation that can be incorporated into WB with minimal curator review. Our approach is generalizable and could be applied to additional knowledgebases that would like to engage their user community in assisting with the curation. In the five months succeeding the launch of the new system, the response rate has been comparable with that of the previous AFP version, but the quality and quantity of the data received has greatly improved.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualKnowledge BasesAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansData CurationData MiningInternetSupport Vector MachineUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID32185395
PMCPMC7078066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.