ArticleBioMed research international2020
Pedicle Morphometry Variations in Individuals with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Exploring cortical trajectory of the lumbar vertebrae: a morphometric study in dry skeletons: a retrospective study in Thailand.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
- A novel method to evaluate the transverse pedicle angles of the lower lumbar vertebrae using digital radiography.PloS one · 2024Article
- Finite element analysis of endoscopic cross-overtop decompression for single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis based on real clinical cases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Analysing lumbar pedicle morphometry observed via traditional and recent modalities.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Predictive factors for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a model obtained from a machine learning algorithm technique.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the degenerative lumbar osseous morphology using zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging (ZTE-MRI).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022Article
- A morphological characterization of the lumbar neural arch in females and males with degenerative spondylolisthesis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- The Role of Vertebral Morphometry in the Pathogenesis of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.BioMed research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare pedicle dimensions in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) with those in the general population. A retrospective computerized tomography (CT) study for lumbar vertebrae (L1 to L5) from two sample populations was used. The first included 165 participants with symptomatic DLSS (age range: 40-88 years, sex ratio: 80 M/85 F), and the second had 180 individuals from the general population (age range: 40-99 years, sex ratio: 90 M/90 F). Both males and females in the stenosis group manifested significantly greater pedicle width than the control group at all lumbar levels (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.