Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32185198›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Antidepressant-Like Effects and Cognitive Enhancement of Coadministration of Chaihu Shugan San and Fluoxetine: Dependent on the BDNF-ERK-CREB Signaling Pathway in the Hippocampus and Frontal Cortex.

Lijing Yan, Xia Xu, Zhenyu He, Sheng Wang, Linlin Zhao, Juan Qiu, Dongsheng Wang, Zhicheng Gong, Xinjian Qiu, Huiyong Huang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Study on the Neuroprotective Effects of Perindopril and Benazepril in Experimentally-induced Chronic Mild Stress in Rats.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Activation of 5-HTMolecular neurobiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. D1R-5-HT2AR Uncoupling Reduces Depressive Behaviours via HDAC Signalling.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lijing Yan *Laboratory of Ethnopharmacology, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7541-8116
Xia Xu *Laboratory of Ethnopharmacology, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Zhenyu HeTaizhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Taizhou, Zhejiang 317500, China.
Sheng WangThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310053, China.
Linlin ZhaoDepartment of Health Management, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1650-6538
Juan QiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Dongsheng WangLaboratory of Ethnopharmacology, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Zhicheng GongDepartment of Pharmacy, Institute for Rational and Safe Medication Practices, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2404-0942
Xinjian QiuLaboratory of Ethnopharmacology, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5705-8559
Huiyong HuangInstitute of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis, Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7803-3425
Central South University · CNHunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluoxetine (FLU) is the first-line and widely used medication for depression; however, FLU treatment is almost ineffective in 30%-40% of patients with depression. In addition, there are some problems in FLU treatment, such as delayed efficacy, large side effects, and poor tolerance. Chaihu Shugan San (CSS) is a classic and effective antidepressant Chinese herbal medicine that has been used in China for thousands of years. CSS or coadministration of CSS and FLU has become one of the most recommended methods in the treatment of depression in China. However, the specific pathways of CSS and coadministration of CSS and FLU for antidepressant are still unclear.

objectiveThis study was designed to evaluate the antidepressant effects of CSS and coadministration of CSS and FLU.

methodsThe chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) rat model was used to simulate depression. 120 healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into seven groups: the control group, CUMS group, low-dose CSS group, high-dose CSS group, FLU group, coadministration of low-dose CSS and FLU group, and coadministration of high-dose CSS and FLU group. The rats in different groups were given different interventions. Then, the depression-like behavior and cognitive function were evaluated by the sucrose preference test (SPT), forced swimming test (FST), open field test (OFT), and Y-maze test. What is more, the antidepressant mechanism of CSS and coadministration of CSS and FLU were studied through BDNF mRNA, ERK mRNA, CREB mRNA, BDNF, p-ERK/ERK, and p-CREB/CREB levels in the hippocampus and frontal cortex by Western blot and RT-PCR.

resultsCompared with the CUMS group, CSS and coadministration of CSS and FLU could alleviate the depressive symptoms and improve cognitive function in CUMS rats (

Indexed as

AnimalsAntidepressive AgentsBehavior, AnimalBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCognitionCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinDisease Models, AnimalFluoxetineFrontal LobeHippocampusMaleMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMaze LearningNootropic AgentsPlant ExtractsRatsAntidepressive AgentsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factorchaihu-shugan-sanCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinFluoxetineNootropic AgentsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID32185198
PMCPMC7060874
OpenAlexW3008014376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.