Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32185197›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Bone Transport for Treatment of Traumatic Composite Tibial Bone and Soft Tissue Defects: Any Specific Needs besides the Ilizarov Technique?

Runguang Li, Guozheng Zhu, Chaojie Chen, Yirong Chen, Gaohong Ren

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Management of Tibial Bone Defects: A Multicenter Experience of Hexapod and Ilizarov Frames.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Runguang LiDepartment of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510610, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4703-7180
Guozheng ZhuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3811-6976
Chaojie ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 511400, China.
Yirong ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Gaohong RenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4941-6723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the surgical efficacy of bone transport (Ilizarov technique) plus "shortening-lengthening," "flap surgery," and "open bone transport" as individualized treatments for traumatic composite tibial bone and soft tissue defects.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed sixty-eight cases (mean age: 35.69 years, (range, 16-65)) treated from July 2014 to June 2017, including 29 middle, 18 distal, and 21 proximal tibial bone defects (4-18 cm, mean: 7.97 cm) with soft tissue defects (2.5 cm × 4.0 cm to 30.0 cm × 35.0 cm after debridement). We adopted the bone transport external fixator to fix the fracture after debriding the defect parts. In the meantime, we adopted the "shortening-lengthening technique," "flap surgery," and "open bone transport" as individualized treatment based on the location, range, and severity of the composite tibial bone and soft tissue defects. Postoperative follow-up was carried out. Surgical efficacy was assessed based on (1) wound healing; (2) bone defect healing rate; (3) external fixation time and index; (4) incidence/recurrence of deep infection; (5) postoperative complications; and (6) Association for the Study and Application of the Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) score.

resultsThe mean duration from injury to reconstruction was 22 days (4-80 d), and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 30.8 months (18-54 m). After the repair and reconstruction, 2 open bone transport patients required infected bone removal first before continuing the bone transport treatment. No deep infection (osteomyelitis) occurred or recurred in the remaining patients, and no secondary debridement was required. Some patients had complications after surgery. All the postoperative complications, including flap venous crisis, nail channel reaction, bone nonunion, mechanical axis deviation, and refracture, were improved or alleviated. External fixation time was 12.5 ± 3.41 months, and the index was 1.63 ± 0.44. According to the ASAMI score, 76.47% of the outcomes were good/excellent.

conclusionThe Ilizarov technique yields satisfactory efficacy for composite tibial bone and soft tissue defects when combined with "shortening-lengthening technique," "flap surgery," and "open bone transport" with appropriate individualized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Bone LengtheningIlizarov TechniquePlastic Surgery ProceduresTibial FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTibia

Identifiers

PMID32185197
PMCPMC7060447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.