Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32184983›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Spatial and temporal variation in prey color patterns for background matching across a continuous heterogeneous environment.

Marleen Baling, Devi Stuart-Fox, Dianne H Brunton, James Dale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Varying benefits of generalist and specialist camouflage in two versus four background environments.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marleen BalingUnitec Institute of Technology Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-4807
Devi Stuart-FoxSchool of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3362-1412
Dianne H BruntonSchool of Natural and Computational Sciences Massey University (Albany Campus) Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-1960
James DaleSchool of Natural and Computational Sciences Massey University (Albany Campus) Auckland New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In heterogeneous habitats, camouflage via background matching can be challenging because visual characteristics can vary dramatically across small spatial scales. Additionally, temporal variation in signaling functions of coloration can affect crypsis, especially when animals use coloration seasonally for intraspecific signaling (e.g., mate selection). We currently have a poor understanding of how wild prey optimize background matching within continuously heterogeneous habitats, and whether this is affected by requirements of intraspecific signaling across biological seasons. Here, we quantified color patterns of a wild population of shore skink (

Indexed as

camouflagecrypsisintraspecific signalingtemporal variation

Identifiers

PMID32184983
PMCPMC7069320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.