Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32184832›Full record

ReviewStem cells international2020

Tissue Engineering Approaches for Enamel, Dentin, and Pulp Regeneration: An Update.

Geraldine M Ahmed, Eman A Abouauf, Nermeen AbuBakr, Christof E Dörfer, Karim Fawzy El-Sayed

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Progress and perspectives on cell-free regenerative endodontic therapy.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Geraldine M AhmedStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2273-3438
Eman A AbouaufStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nermeen AbuBakrStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2962-0070
Christof E DörferClinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany.
Karim Fawzy El-SayedStem Cell and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Cairo University · EGChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem/progenitor cells are undifferentiated cells characterized by their exclusive ability for self-renewal and multilineage differentiation potential. In recent years, researchers and investigations explored the prospect of employing stem/progenitor cell therapy in regenerative medicine, especially stem/progenitor cells originating from the oral tissues. In this context, the regeneration of the lost dental tissues including enamel, dentin, and the dental pulp are pivotal targets for stem/progenitor cell therapy. The present review elaborates on the different sources of stem/progenitor cells and their potential clinical applications to regenerate enamel, dentin, and the dental pulpal tissues.

Identifiers

PMID32184832
PMCPMC7060883
OpenAlexW3008438774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.