Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32184721›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2020

Celtic Provenance in Traditional Herbal Medicine of Medieval Wales and Classical Antiquity.

Charles Wagner, Jillian De Gezelle, Slavko Komarnytsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Phytochemical Analysis and Antioxidant Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles WagnerPlants for Human Health Institute, North Carolina State University, North Carolina Research Campus, Kannapolis, NC, United States.
Jillian De GezelleDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Slavko KomarnytskyPlants for Human Health Institute, North Carolina State University, North Carolina Research Campus, Kannapolis, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Celtic linguistic community dominated large spans of Central and Western Europe between 800 BC and 500 AD, but knowledge of their traditional medicine is very limited. Multiple progressive plant gains in Neolithic settlements along the Danube and up the Rhine valleys suggested that taxon diversity of gathered plants peaked at the Balkans and was subsequently reduced as crop and gathered plants packages were adopted and dispersed throughout Neolithic Europe. This process coincided with the Bronze Age migration of the R1b proto-Celtic tribes, and their herbal traditions were occasionally recorded in the classic Greco-Roman texts on herbal medicines. The provenance of Celtic (Gallic) healing methods and magical formulas as recorded by Pliny, Scribonius Largus, and Marcellus Empiricus can still be found in the first part of the medieval Welsh (Cymry) herbal manuscript

Indexed as

bioactive compoundsethnobotanyethnopharmacologyherbal textsmedicinal plants

Identifiers

PMID32184721
PMCPMC7058801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.