Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32184677›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2020

Obstetric Outcomes of Pregnancy After Uterine Artery Embolization.

Mariko Jitsumori, Shinya Matsuzaki, Masayuki Endo, Takeya Hara, Takuji Tomimatsu, Satoko Matsuzaki, Tatsuya Miyake, Tsuyoshi Takiuchi, Aiko Kakigano, Kazuya Mimura and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Surgery and minimally invasive treatments for uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariko Jitsumori *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Shinya Matsuzaki *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5725-9994
Masayuki EndoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Takeya HaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Takuji TomimatsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Satoko MatsuzakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Otemae Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tatsuya MiyakeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8919-8716
Tsuyoshi TakiuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0605-5219
Aiko KakiganoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuya MimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0950-7110
Eiji KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yutaka UedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tadashi KimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
The University of Osaka · JPOtemae Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine artery embolization (UAE) is used to treat severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). According to a few studies, UAE for PPH was associated with preterm birth, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in subsequent pregnancies. These previous studies, however, lacked controls, and to the best of our knowledge, no systematic literature reviews have been conducted thus far. We report the results of our retrospective case-control study of pregnancies after UAE at a single center and include a literature review to evaluate the risk of PAS in pregnancies after UAE.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from deliveries at our hospital between January 2012 and October 2017. We divided the delivery data into cases with previous UAEs performed for PPH (the post-UAE group) and those without UAEs (the non-UAE group, which included women without previous PPH). We defined PAS as cases in which hysterectomy was performed and pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

resultsWe used data from 3155 patients in this study, of whom 16 patients had undergone UAE (post-UAE group) and 3139 had not (non-UAE group). We found no differences between the groups in terms of frequency of preterm births (12.5% versus 14.2%, respectively; OR, 0.863; 95% CI, 0.218 to 3.414;

conclusionOur results suggest that previous UAE is a significant risk factor for PAS.

Indexed as

obstetric outcomesplacenta accretaplacenta accreta spectrumpostpartum hemorrhageuterine artery embolization

Identifiers

PMID32184677
PMCPMC7064279
OpenAlexW3010003726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.