ArticleCancer management and research2020
The Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Over Radiotherapy After R0 Resection for Stage II-III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative radiotherapy for resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy Versus Surgery Alone for Stage IIB-III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial.The oncologist · 2021Trial
- In-Depth Analysis of the Necessity and Optimization Strategies for Adjuvant Radiotherapy Following Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in the New Era of Esophageal Cancer Treatment.Cancer innovation · 2025Review
- Optimal Treatment Strategies for Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Triple Cohort Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Circular RNA hsa_circ_0000277 promotes tumor progression and DDP resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy for Patients with pN+ Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Correlates of Long-Term Survival of Patients with pN+ Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Esophagectomy.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study compared the effectiveness and safety of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) containing paclitaxel (PTX) and cisplatin (DDP) with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after R0 resection for stage II-III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC). MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, 87 TESCC patients treated with PORT were matched 1:1 to 87 patients who received POCRT between July 2012 and December 2018. Radiotherapy was delivered at a dose of 200 cGy per day to a total dose of 5000 cGy. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of DDP (25 mg/m
resultsPatient- and disease-related characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) times were 39.2 and 31.0 months, respectively. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 31.9% and 19.1% in the PORT group and 45.1% and 35.1% in the POCRT group, respectively. Statistical significance was demonstrated by comparing OS and DFS (P=0.022 and 0.016, respectively). Additionally, subgroup analysis revealed that in node positive TESCC patients, the POCRT group was significantly different from the PORT group regarding OS and DFS (P=0.049 and 0.039, respectively). POCRT decreased distant metastasis over PORT (P=0.044) with manageable toxicities. Multivariate analysis revealed that aside from factors associated with tumor stages, treatment modality was another strong prognostic factor for both OS and DFS (P=0.015 and 0.010, respectively).
conclusionStage II-III TESCC patients could benefit from POCRT with manageable toxicities. Future well-designed prospective studies are highly warranted to confirm the findings in our report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.