Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32184540›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2020

Comparison of foot kinematics and the morphology of intrinsic musculature of the foot using a foot-type classification based on function.

Shintarou Kudo, Kodai Sakamoto, Takeshi Shirakawa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shintarou KudoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences: 1-26-16 Nanko-kita, Suminoe-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka 559-8611, Japan.
Kodai SakamotoGraduate School of Health Sciences, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Japan.
Takeshi ShirakawaDepartment of Rehabilitation, AR-Ex Medical Group Toritudai Orthopedics Clinic, Japan.
Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences · JPOkayama Psychiatric Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate a correlation between the morphology of the intrinsic musculature of the foot and foot kinematics during gait using a foot type classification based on the windlass function. [Participants and Methods] We examined 67 feet of 35 healthy participants in this study. We collected three-dimensional foot kinematic data during gait from the Oxford Foot Model and assessed the morphology of the flexor digitorum brevis, abductor hallucis, adductor halluces (oblique head), and abductor digiti minimi muscles using B-mode ultrasound. Using the Foot Posture Index (six-item version), we divided static foot postures into two groups: normal arch and flatfoot. Subsequently, we compared foot kinematics and the morphology of the intrinsic musculature among the four groups using the analysis of variance with the Bonferroni test. [Results] Foot kinematics of the flatfoot-adduction type during gait significantly differed from that of the normal arch-abduction type. The abductor digiti minimi of the flatfoot-adduction type was significantly thinner than that of the normal arch-abduction type. [Conclusion] There may be some variations in flatfoot, and the flatfoot-abduction type might not be a risk factor for overuse injuries.

Indexed as

Flat footIntrinsic foot musclesKinematics

Identifiers

PMID32184540
PMCPMC7064354
OpenAlexW3011797573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.