ArticleRemote sensing of environment2020
Detecting flowering phenology in oil seed rape parcels with Sentinel-1 and -2 time series.
Article in Remote sensing of environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- DM_CorrMatch: a semi-supervised semantic segmentation framework for rapeseed flower coverage estimation using UAV imagery.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Digital Repeat Photography Application for Flowering Stage Classification of Selected Woody Plants.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CARM30: China annual rapeseed maps at 30 m spatial resolution from 2000 to 2022 using multi-source data.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Rape Yield Estimation Considering Non-Foliar Green Organs Based on the General Crop Growth Model.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Automatic rape flower cluster counting method based on low-cost labelling and UAV-RGB images.Plant methods · 2023Article
- Rapid Identification of Main Vegetation Types in the Lingkong Mountain Nature Reserve Based on Multi-Temporal Modified Vegetation Indices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automatic counting of rapeseed inflorescences using deep learning method and UAV RGB imagery.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Abundance considerations for modeling yield of rapeseed at the flowering stage.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Article
- Recognition of Maize Phenology in Sentinel Images with Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The flowering of Atlantic Forest Pleroma trees.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Comparing land surface phenology of major European crops as derived from SAR and multispectral data of Sentinel-1 and -2.Remote sensing of environment · 2021Article
- Phenotyping Flowering in Canola (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Harmonised LUCAS in-situ land cover and use database for field surveys from 2006 to 2018 in the European Union.Scientific data · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel methodology is proposed to robustly map oil seed rape (OSR) flowering phenology from time series generated from the Copernicus Sentinel-1 (S1) and Sentinel-2 (S2) sensors. The time series are averaged at parcel level, initially for a set of 229 reference parcels for which multiple phenological observations on OSR flowering have been collected from April 21 to May 19, 2018. The set of OSR parcels is extended to a regional sample of 32,355 OSR parcels derived from a regional S2 classification. The study area comprises the northern Brandenburg and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (N) and the southern Bavaria (S) regions in Germany. A method was developed to automatically compute peak flowering at parcel level from the S2 time signature of the Normalized Difference Yellow Index (NDYI) and from the local minimum in S1 VV polarized backscattering coefficients. Peak flowering was determined at a temporal accuracy of 1 to 4 days. A systematic flowering delay of 1 day was observed in the S1 detection compared to S2. Peak flowering differed by 12 days between the N and S. Considerable local variation was observed in the N-S parcel-level flowering gradient. Additional in-situ phenology observations at 70 Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) stations confirm the spatial and temporal consistency between S1 and S2 signatures and flowering phenology across both regions. Conditions during flowering strongly determine OSR yield, therefore, the capacity to continuously characterize spatially the timing of key flowering dates across large areas is key. To illustrate this, expected flowering dates were simulated assuming a single OSR variety with a 425 growing degree days (GDD) requirement to reach flowering. This GDD requirement was calculated based on parcel-level peak flowering dates and temperatures accumulated from 25-km gridded meteorological data. The correlation between simulated and S2 observed peak flowering dates still equaled 0.84 and 0.54 for the N and S respectively. These Sentinel-based parcel-level flowering parameters can be combined with weather data to support in-season predictions of OSR yield, area, and production. Our approach identified the unique temporal signatures of S1 and S2 associated with OSR flowering and can now be applied to monitor OSR phenology for parcels across the globe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.