Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32184306›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Psychometric validation of a Patient-Centred Quality of Cancer Care Questionnaire in Mexico.

Svetlana V Doubova, Ingrid Patricia Martinez-Vega, Marcos Gutiérrez-De-la-Barrera, Claudia Infante-Castañeda, Carlos E Aranda-Flores, Adriana Monroy, Laura Gómez-Laguna, Felicia Marie Knaul, Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Conceptualization of patient-centered care in Latin America: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  6. [Quality of care in patients with prostate cancer treated in Mexico].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2022
    Article
  7. Social inequalities in supportive care needs and quality of patient-centered care of cancer patients in Mexico.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Svetlana V DoubovaEpidemiology and Health Services Research Unit CMN Siglo XXI, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico svetlana.doubova@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0521-7095
Ingrid Patricia Martinez-VegaEpidemiology and Health Services Research Unit CMN Siglo XXI, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico.
Marcos Gutiérrez-De-la-BarreraHospital de Oncología CMN Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Claudia Infante-CastañedaInstitute of Social Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Carlos E Aranda-FloresServicio de Oncología, Hospital General de México Dr Eduardo Liceaga, Mexico City, Mexico.
Adriana MonroyServicio de Oncología, Hospital General de México Dr Eduardo Liceaga, Mexico City, Mexico.
Laura Gómez-LagunaServicio de Oncología, Hospital General de México Dr Eduardo Liceaga, Mexico City, Mexico.
Felicia Marie KnaulSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Ricardo Pérez-CuevasDivision of Social Protection and Health, Inter-American Development Bank, Kingston, Jamaica.
Hospital General de México · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MXInter-American Development Bank · USUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a Patient-Centred Quality of Cancer Care Questionnaire in Spanish (PCQCCQ-S) appropriate to the Mexican context.

designPsychometric validation of a questionnaire.

settingTwo public oncology hospitals in Mexico City.

participants1809 patients with cancer aged ≥18 years. SOURCE OF INFORMATION: Cross-sectional survey.

methodsThe validation procedures comprised (1) content validity through a group of experts and patients; (2) item reduction and evaluation of the factor structure, through an exploratory factor analysis based on the polychoric correlation matrix; (3) internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha; (4) convergent validity between the PCQCCQ-S and supportive care needs scale; (5) correlation analysis between the PCQCCQ-S and quality of life scale by calculating Spearman's rank-correlation coefficient; and (6) differentiation by 'known groups' through the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

resultsThe PCQCCQ-S has 30 items with the following five factors accounting for 96.5% of the total variance: (1) timely care; (2) clarity of the information; (3) information for treatment decision-making; (4) activities to address biopsychosocial needs; and (5) respectful and coordinated care. Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.73 to 0.90 among the factors. PCQCCQ-S has moderate convergent validity with supportive care needs scale, revealing that higher quality is correlated with lower patient needs. PCQCCQ-S has acceptable ability to differentiate by 'known groups', showing that older patients and those with low levels of education perceived lower total quality of care as compared with their counterparts.

conclusionPCQCCQ-S has acceptable psychometric properties and can be used to measure quality of patient-centred cancer care in Mexico and serve as a reference to develop PCQCCQ-S in other Spanish-speaking countries.

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMexicoMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CarePsychometricsYoung AdultcancerMexicopatient-centered quality of carepsychometric validation of scale

Identifiers

PMID32184306
PMCPMC7076235
OpenAlexW3010696098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.