Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32184213›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2020

Identification and management of frailty in English primary care: a qualitative study of national policy.

Khulud Alharbi, Harm van Marwijk, David Reeves, Tom Blakeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Role of Cognitive Frailty in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A rapid review of interventions to improve medicine self-management for older people living at home.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Khulud AlharbiPhD Student, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Khulud.alharbi@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.
Harm van MarwijkGP and Professor of General Practice, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
David ReevesReader, National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Services, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Tom BlakemanClinical Senior Lecturer in Primary Care, NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Greater Manchester, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolicymakers are directing attention to addressing the needs of an ageing population. Since 2017, general practices in England have been contractually required to identify and code 'frailty' as a new clinical concept and, in doing so, support targeted management for this population with the aim of improving outcomes. However, embedding frailty policies into routine practice is not without challenges and little is currently known about the success of the programme.

aimTo explore the implementation of a national policy on frailty identification and management in English primary care. DESIGN &

settingQualitative study entailing interviews with primary care professionals in the North of England.

methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs (

resultsPrimary care professionals were starting to use the concept of frailty to structure care within practices and across organisations; however, there was widespread concern about the challenge of providing expanded care for the identified needs with existing resources. Concerns were also expressed around how best to identify the frail subpopulation and the limitations of current tools for this, and there was a professional reticence to use the term 'frailty' with patients.

conclusionFindings suggests that additional, focused resources and the development of a stronger evidence base are essential to facilitate professional engagement in policies to improve the targeted coding and management of frailty in primary care.

Indexed as

frailtygeneral practicenormalisation process theorypolicy

Identifiers

PMID32184213
PMCPMC7330193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.