Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32184189›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Neural correlates of non-specific skin conductance responses during resting state fMRI.

Joshua Gertler, Stephanie Novotny, Andrew Poppe, Yu Sun Chung, James J Gross, Godfrey Pearlson, Michael C Stevens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Neutral and Negative Images on Galvanic Skin Response: An Activity for Courses in Forensic, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Sympathetic and parasympathetic central autonomic networks.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua GertlerOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Stephanie NovotnyOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Andrew PoppeOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Yu Sun ChungOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Hartford, CT, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
James J GrossDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Godfrey PearlsonOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Hartford, CT, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michael C StevensOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Hartford, CT, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: michael.stevens@hhchealth.org.
Hartford Financial Services (United States)Neuropsychiatric Research Institute · USStanford University · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Neural Architecture of Emotion Regulation, Adolescent Development and DepressionR01MH102854 · NIMH · HARTFORD HOSPITAL · PI STEVENS, MICHAEL C · 2015 to 2018
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin conductance responses (SCRs) reliably occur in the absence of external stimulation. However, the neural correlates of these non-specific SCRs have been less explored than brain activity associated with stimulus-elicited SCRs. This study modeled spontaneous skin conductance responses observed during an unstructured resting state fMRI scan in 58 adolescents. A Finite Impulse Response (FIR) fMRI model was used to detect any type of hemodynamic response shape time-locked to non-specific SCRs; the shape of these responses was then carefully characterized. The strongest evidence for signal change was found in several sub-regions of sensorimotor cortex. There also was evidence for engagement of discrete areas within the lateral surfaces of the parietal lobe, cingulate cortex, fronto-insular operculum, and both visual and auditory primary processing areas. The hemodynamic profile measured by FIR modeling clearly resembled an event-related response. However, it was a complex response, best explained by two quickly successive, but opposing neuronal impulses across all brain regions - a brief positive response that begins several seconds prior to the SCR with a much longer negative neuronal impulse beginning shortly after the SCR onset. Post hoc exploratory analyses linked these two hemodynamic response phases to different emotion-related individual differences. In conclusion, this study shows the neural correlates of non-specific SCRs are a widespread, cortical network of brain regions engaged in a complex, seemingly biphasic fashion. This bimodal response profile should be considered in replication studies that attempt to directly link brain activity to possible homeostatic mechanisms or seek evidence for alternative mechanisms.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainBrain MappingChildFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRestElectrodermalfMRIResting stateSkin conductanceSpontaneous fluctuations

Identifiers

PMID32184189
PMCPMC7263940
OpenAlexW3011217544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.