Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183902›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation of a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of a scaled-up whole-school physical activity program for adolescents: Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1).

Matthew Mclaughlin, Jed Duff, Rachel Sutherland, Elizabeth Campbell, Luke Wolfenden, John Wiggers

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew MclaughlinHunter New England Population Health, Longworth Avenue, Wallsend, 2287, NSW, Australia. matthew.mclaughlin@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2870-8556
Jed DuffSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-0303
Rachel SutherlandHunter New England Population Health, Longworth Avenue, Wallsend, 2287, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0470-7663
Elizabeth CampbellHunter New England Population Health, Longworth Avenue, Wallsend, 2287, NSW, Australia.
Luke WolfendenHunter New England Population Health, Longworth Avenue, Wallsend, 2287, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-3868
John WiggersHunter New England Population Health, Longworth Avenue, Wallsend, 2287, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6361-9685

Funding

NSW Ministry of Health (AU) H16/22534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) is a physical activity program for secondary schools located in low-socioeconomic areas. Over a 24-month period, schools in the program arm of a cluster randomised controlled trial (n = up to 38 schools) will receive a multi-component implementation support strategy to embed the seven school physical activity practices of the PA4E1 program. This article describes the process evaluation of the PA4E1 hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. The process evaluation aims to describe the fidelity and reach of the implementation support strategies using quantitative data; and to describe the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the implementation support strategies and physical activity practices to school stakeholders using mixed methods.

methodsQuantitative and qualitative data will be collected from participants (Physical Education teachers, in-School Champions, students) in the program arm. Data collection will involve semi-structured interviews, focus groups, a fidelity monitoring log, a fidelity checklist, surveys, and routinely collected administrative and website data. Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively and qualitative data will be analysed thematically within and across data sets. Triangulation between data sources will be used to synthesise findings regarding the implementation and potential mechanisms of impact of PA4E1 on school physical activity practice adoption, with respect to context. DISCUSSION: Results of the process evaluation will facilitate the interpretation of the findings of the trial outcomes. It will comprehensively describe what was actually implemented and identify the potential contribution of the various components of the implementation support strategy to the school physical activity practice adoption outcomes. Findings will inform future improvement and scale-up of PA4E1 and approaches to implementing secondary school-based physical activity programs more broadly.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000681358 registered 12 May 2017.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionPhysical Education and TrainingAdolescentAustraliaFocus GroupsHumansPoverty AreasProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchoolsStudentsAdolescentsImplementationMixed methodsPhysical activityProcess evaluationRandomised controlled trialSchools

Identifiers

PMID32183902
PMCPMC7077014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.