Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183897›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Implementation of the patient version of the evidence-based (S3) guideline for psychosocial interventions for patients with severe mental illness (IMPPETUS): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Johanna Breilmann, Reinhold Kilian, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Uta Gühne, Alkomiet Hasan, Peter Falkai, Andreas Allgöwer, Rainer Muche, Thomas Becker, Klemens Ajayi and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna BreilmannDepartment of Psychiatry ll, Ulm University, Guenzburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2, 89312, Guenzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0591-5969
Reinhold KilianDepartment of Psychiatry ll, Ulm University, Guenzburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2, 89312, Guenzburg, Germany.
Steffi G Riedel-HellerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Uta GühneInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Alkomiet HasanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter FalkaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas AllgöwerInstitute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Rainer MucheInstitute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas BeckerDepartment of Psychiatry ll, Ulm University, Guenzburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2, 89312, Guenzburg, Germany.
Klemens AjayiKbo-Isar-Amper hospital, Haar, Taufkirchen, Munich, Germany.
Peter BriegerKbo-Isar-Amper hospital, Haar, Taufkirchen, Munich, Germany.
Karel FraschDepartment of Psychiatry ll, Ulm University, Guenzburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2, 89312, Guenzburg, Germany.
Stephan HeresKbo-Isar-Amper hospital, Haar, Taufkirchen, Munich, Germany.
Markus JägerDepartment of Psychiatry ll, Ulm University, Guenzburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2, 89312, Guenzburg, Germany.
Andreas KüthmannDistrict Hospital Memmingen, Memmingen, Germany.
Albert PutzhammerDistrict Hospital Kaufbeuren, Kaufbeuren, Germany.
Max SchmaußDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Bertram SchneeweißKbo-Isar-Amper hospital, Haar, Taufkirchen, Munich, Germany.
Michael SchwarzKbo-Isar-Amper hospital, Haar, Taufkirchen, Munich, Germany.
Markus KöstersDepartment of Psychiatry ll, Ulm University, Guenzburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str. 2, 89312, Guenzburg, Germany. markus.koesters@uni-ulm.de.
Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost · DEBundeswehrkrankenhaus · DEUniversität Ulm · DELeipzig University · DEUniversity of Augsburg · DEKempten University of Applied Sciences · DEKernkraftwerk Gundremmingen · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA (DE) 01VSF17017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe German guideline on psychosocial interventions for people with severe mental disorders recommends a broad spectrum of evidence-based treatments. Structured implementation of the associated patient version of the guideline is missing to date. The study aims to assess whether structured implementation of a patient guideline improves the empowerment of patients with severe mental disorders, as well as knowledge, attitudes and experiences regarding psychosocial interventions, service use, treatment satisfaction, treatment needs, quality of life and burden of care.

methodsThe study is a multicentre, cluster-randomised, controlled study with two parallel groups. Inpatients and day hospital patients (all sexes; 18-65 years) with severe mental disorders will be included. Additionally, relatives of patients with mental disorders (all sexes; ≥ 18 years) will be included. In the experimental group, the patient guideline will be implemented using a multimodal strategy. Participants in the control group will receive treatment as usual but will be made aware of the patient guideline. The primary outcome is the change of empowerment, assessed by using the 'empowerment in the process of psychiatric treatment of patients with affective and schizophrenia disorders' (EPAS) scale. In addition, knowledge, attitudes and experiences regarding psychosocial interventions will be assessed as secondary outcomes, as well as service use, satisfaction with care, patient need and quality of life and participation and social inclusion. For relatives, the perceived burden of care also will be recorded. Results will be analysed using hierarchical linear models. For the health economic evaluation, the incremental cost-utility ratios will be computed using the differences in total costs of illness and the differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) between study groups. DISCUSSION: The study will be the first to assess the effects of a structured implementation of the patient version of a psychiatric treatment guideline. The study has some limitations regarding the transferability of the results to other patients and other regions. Furthermore, problems with the recruitment of patients and relatives and with the implementation of intervention could occur during the study.

trial registrationThe study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) under registration number DRKS00017577 (Date of registration: 23 October 2019.

Indexed as

Day Care, MedicalEvidence-Based PracticeHospitalizationCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMental DisordersMulticenter Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicPsychotherapyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGuideline, Implementation, Patient version, Cluster randomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID32183897
PMCPMC7079434
OpenAlexW3011519431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.