Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183797›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Development and upgrading of public primary healthcare facilities with essential surgical services infrastructure: a strategy towards achieving universal health coverage in Tanzania.

Ntuli A Kapologwe, John G Meara, James T Kengia, Yusuph Sonda, Dorothy Gwajima, Shehnaz Alidina, Albino Kalolo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ntuli A KapologwePresident's Office - Regional Administration and Local Government (Directorate of Health, Social Welfare and Nutrition Services), P.O Box 1923, Dodoma, Tanzania. nkapologwe2002@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0900-2937
John G MearaProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
James T KengiaPresident's Office - Regional Administration and Local Government (Directorate of Health, Social Welfare and Nutrition Services), P.O Box 1923, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Yusuph SondaPresident's Office - Regional Administration and Local Government (Directorate of Health, Social Welfare and Nutrition Services), P.O Box 1923, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Dorothy GwajimaPresident's Office - Regional Administration and Local Government (Directorate of Health, Social Welfare and Nutrition Services), P.O Box 1923, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Shehnaz AlidinaProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Albino KaloloDepartment of Public Health, St. Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O Box 175, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare · TZBoston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

This study was founded by the President's Office - Regional Administration and Local Government (PORALG) of Tanzania. TA/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfrastructure development and upgrading to support safe surgical services in primary health care facilities is an important step in the journey towards achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Quality health service provision together with equitable geographic access and service delivery are important components that constitute UHC. Tanzania has been investing in infrastructure development to offer essential safe surgery close to communities at affordable costs while ensuring better outcomes. This study aimed to understand the public sector's efforts to improve the infrastructure of primary health facilities between 2005 and 2019. We assessed the construction rates, geographic coverage, and physical status of each facility, surgical safety and services rendered in public primary health facilities.

methodsData was collected from existing policy reports, the Services Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool (physical status), the Health Facility Registry (HFR), implementation reports on infrastructure development from the 26 regions and 185 district councils across the country (covering assessment of physical infrastructure, waste management systems and inventories for ambulances) and Comprehensive Emergence Obstetric Care (CEMONC) signal functions assessment tool. Data was descriptively analyzed so as to understand the distribution of primary health care facilities and their status (old, new, upgraded, under construction, renovated and equipped), and the service provided, including essential surgical services.

resultsOf 5072 (518 are Health Centers and 4554 are Dispensaries) existing public primary health care facilities, the majority (46%) had a physical status of A (good state), 33% (1693) had physical status of B (minor renovation needed) and the remaining facilities had physical status of C up to F (needing major renovation). About 33% (1673) of all health facilities had piped water and 5.1% had landline telecommunication system. Between 2015 and August 2019, a total of 419 (8.3%) health facilities (Consisting of 350 health centers and 69 District Council Hospitals) were either renovated or constructed and equipped to offer safe surgery services. Of all Health Centers only 115 (22.2%) were offering the CEMONC services. Of these 115 health facilities, only 20 (17.4%) were offering the CEMONC services with all 9 - signal functions and only 17.4% had facilities that are offering safe blood transfusion services.

conclusionThis study indicates that between 2015 and 2019 there has been improvement in physical status of primary health facilities as a result constructions, upgrading and equipping the facilities to offer safe surgery and related diagnostic services. Despite the achievements, still there is a high demand for good physical statuses and functioning of primary health facilities with capacity to offer essential and safe surgical services in the country also as an important strategy towards achieving UHC. This is also inline with the National Surgical, Obstetrics and Anesthesia plan (NSOAP).

Indexed as

General SurgeryHealth Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareUniversal Health InsuranceFemaleHealth FacilitiesHospitals, DistrictHumansMaleMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyTanzaniaInfrastructurePrimary health facilitiesSafe surgeryUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID32183797
PMCPMC7076948
OpenAlexW3011638252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.