ArticleBMC health services research2020
Assessing quality of newborn care at district facilities in Malawi.
Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gram-negative neonatal sepsis in low- and lower-middle-income countries and WHO empirical antibiotic recommendations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Integrating behavioural science and design thinking to develop a water treatment innovation in Malawi healthcare: a case study of the intervention design process.Global health action · 2026Article
- Impact and cost-effectiveness of Neotree, a digital data capture and decision support tool designed to improve neonatal survival in Zimbabwe: an interrupted time series analysis and economic evaluation.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Understanding the initiation, formation, functioning, and performing of networks to change practices - Realist evaluation of a programme to improve newborn care in Kenya.SSM - health systems · 2025Article
- Article
- Establishment of a neonatal nursery in a rural district hospital in Malawi: a retrospective review of neonatal outcomes in Neno District Hospital (2014-2021).BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Factors associated with the admission of moderate to late preterm and term neonates within 72 hours of birth at Dedza and Mangochi District Hospitals, Malawi: a matched case-control study.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Factors Influencing the Implementation of Infant Warming Devices Among Healthcare Workers in Malawian Hospitals.Global pediatric health · 2024Article
- Determinants of neonatal mortality among hospitalised neonates with sepsis at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi: A mixed-methods study.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Quality of newborn care and associated factors: An analysis of the 2022 Kenya demographic and health survey.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Critical care capacity and care bundles on medical wards in Malawi: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- The Journey Toward Establishing Inpatient Care for Small and Sick Newborns in Ethiopia, India, Malawi, and Rwanda.Global health, science and practice · 2023Article
- Challenges and recommendations to improve implementation of phototherapy among neonates in Malawian hospitals.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- Resource availability and barriers to delivering quality care for newborns in hospitals in the southern region of Malawi: A multisite observational study.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Beyond early initiation: A qualitative study on the challenges of hospital-based postpartum breastfeeding support.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Familiar but neglected: identification of gaps and recommendations to close them on exclusive breastfeeding support in health facilities in Malawi.International breastfeeding journal · 2021Article
- COVID-19 and beyond: how lessons and evidence from implementation research can benefit health systems' response and preparedness for COVID-19 and future epidemics.Family medicine and community health · 2021Review
- Facility assessment and qualitative analysis of health worker perspectives on neonatal health in Malawi.BMC research notes · 2021Article
- Distance to available services for newborns at facilities in Malawi: A secondary analysis of survey and health facility data.PloS one · 2021Article
- Qualitative Assessment of the Quality of Care for Preterm, Low Birth Weight, and Sick Newborns in Ethiopia.Health services insights · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMalawi is celebrated as one of the few countries in sub-Saharan Africa to meet the Millennium Development Goal of reducing under-5 mortality by two-thirds between 1990 and 2015. However, within this age range neonatal mortality rates are the slowest to decline, even though rates of facility births are increasing. Examining the quality of neonatal care at district-level facilities where most deliveries occur is warranted.
objectiveThe objective of this paper is to evaluate the quality of neonatal care in three district hospitals and one primary health centre in southern Malawi as well as to report the limitations and lessons learned on using the WHO integrated quality of care assessment tool.
methodsThese facility assessments were part of the "Integrating a neonatal healthcare package for Malawi" project, a part of the Innovating for Maternal and Child Health in Africa (IMCHA) initiative. The WHO integrated quality of care assessment tool was used to assess quality of care and availability and quantity of supplies and resources. The modules on infrastructure, neonatal care and labour and delivery were included. Facility assessments were administered in November 2017 and aspects of care were scored on a Likert scale from one to five (a score of 5 indicating compliance with WHO standards of care; one as lowest indicating inadequate care).
resultsThe continuum of labour, delivery and neonatal care were assessed to identify areas that required improvements to meet standards of care. Critical areas for improvements included infection control (mean score 2.9), equipment, supplies and setup for newborn care in the labor ward (2.3), in the surgical theater (3.3), and nursery (3.4 nursery facilities, 3.0 supplies and equipment), as well as for management of sick newborns (3.2), monitoring and follow-up (3.6). Only one of the 12 domains, laboratory, met the standards of care with only minor improvements needed (4.0).
conclusionThe WHO integrated quality of care assessment tool is a validated tool that can shed light on the complex quality of care challenges faced by district-level health facilities. The results reveal that the quality of care needs improvement, particularly for sick and vulnerable newborns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.