Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183795›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Assessing quality of newborn care at district facilities in Malawi.

Kondwani Kawaza, Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Tamanda Hiwa, Jenala Njirammadzi, Mwai Banda, Marianne Vidler, Laura Newberry, Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando, Queen Dube, Elizabeth Molyneux and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kondwani KawazaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. kkawaza@medcol.mw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9432-4916
Mai-Lei Woo KinshellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tamanda HiwaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Jenala NjirammadziDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Mwai BandaCollege of Medicine, IMCHA Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Marianne VidlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Laura NewberryDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Alinane Linda Nyondo-MipandoCollege of Medicine, IMCHA Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Queen DubeCollege of Medicine, IMCHA Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Elizabeth MolyneuxCollege of Medicine, IMCHA Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
David M GoldfarbDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
University of Malawi · MWBlantyre Institute for Community Ophthalmology · MWUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

International Development Research Centre 108030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalawi is celebrated as one of the few countries in sub-Saharan Africa to meet the Millennium Development Goal of reducing under-5 mortality by two-thirds between 1990 and 2015. However, within this age range neonatal mortality rates are the slowest to decline, even though rates of facility births are increasing. Examining the quality of neonatal care at district-level facilities where most deliveries occur is warranted.

objectiveThe objective of this paper is to evaluate the quality of neonatal care in three district hospitals and one primary health centre in southern Malawi as well as to report the limitations and lessons learned on using the WHO integrated quality of care assessment tool.

methodsThese facility assessments were part of the "Integrating a neonatal healthcare package for Malawi" project, a part of the Innovating for Maternal and Child Health in Africa (IMCHA) initiative. The WHO integrated quality of care assessment tool was used to assess quality of care and availability and quantity of supplies and resources. The modules on infrastructure, neonatal care and labour and delivery were included. Facility assessments were administered in November 2017 and aspects of care were scored on a Likert scale from one to five (a score of 5 indicating compliance with WHO standards of care; one as lowest indicating inadequate care).

resultsThe continuum of labour, delivery and neonatal care were assessed to identify areas that required improvements to meet standards of care. Critical areas for improvements included infection control (mean score 2.9), equipment, supplies and setup for newborn care in the labor ward (2.3), in the surgical theater (3.3), and nursery (3.4 nursery facilities, 3.0 supplies and equipment), as well as for management of sick newborns (3.2), monitoring and follow-up (3.6). Only one of the 12 domains, laboratory, met the standards of care with only minor improvements needed (4.0).

conclusionThe WHO integrated quality of care assessment tool is a validated tool that can shed light on the complex quality of care challenges faced by district-level health facilities. The results reveal that the quality of care needs improvement, particularly for sick and vulnerable newborns.

Indexed as

Hospitals, DistrictInfant CareFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansInfant, NewbornMalawiPregnancyQuality Assurance, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsWorld Health OrganizationDistrict hospitalsMalawiNeonatal careQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID32183795
PMCPMC7079536
OpenAlexW3012509810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.