Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183753›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2020

Global trends and gaps in research related to latent tuberculosis infection.

Liling Chaw, Lung-Chang Chien, Justin Wong, Ken Takahashi, David Koh, Ro-Ting Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A critical analysis of the decreasing trends in tuberculosis cure indicators in Brazil, 2001-2022.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liling ChawPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link BE1410, Gadong, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam.
Lung-Chang ChienEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89119, USA.
Justin WongDisease Control Division, Ministry of Health, Brunei Darussalam; Commonwealth Drive, BB3910, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam.
Ken TakahashiAsbestos Diseases Research Institute, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia.
David KohPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link BE1410, Gadong, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam.
Ro-Ting LinDepartment of Occupational Safety and Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Room 1610, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan. roting@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2687-203X

Funding

China Medical University, Taiwan CMU107-N-12China Medical University, Taiwan CMU107-Z-04China Medical University, Taiwan CMU108-MF-09Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 107-2314-B-039-062-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a global commitment to eliminating tuberculosis (TB). It is critical to detect and treat cases of latent TB infection (LTBI), the reservoir of new TB cases. Our study assesses trends in publication of LTBI-related research.

methodsWe used the keywords ("latent tuberculosis" OR "LTBI" OR "latent TB") to search the Web of Science for LTBI-related articles published 1995-2018, then classified the results into three research areas: laboratory sciences, clinical research, and public health. We calculated the proportions of LTBI-related articles in each area to three areas combined, the average rates of LTBI-related to all scientific and TB-related articles, and the average annual percent changes (AAPC) in rates for all countries and for the top 13 countries individually and combined publishing LTBI research.

resultsThe proportion of LTBI-related articles increased over time in all research areas, with the highest AAPC in laboratory (38.2%/yr), followed by public health (22.9%/yr) and clinical (15.1%/yr). South Africa (rate ratio [RR] = 8.28, 95% CI 5.68 to 12.08) and India (RR = 2.53, 95% CI 1.74 to 3.69) had higher RRs of overall TB-related articles to all articles, but did not outperform the average of the top 13 countries in the RRs of LTBI-related articles to TB-related articles. Italy (RR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.63), Canada (RR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.34), and Spain (RR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.07) had higher RRs of LTBI-related articles to TB-related articles.

conclusionsHigh TB burden countries (TB incidence > 100 per 100,000 population) published more overall TB-related research, whereas low TB burden countries showed greater focus on LTBI. Given the potential benefits, high TB burden countries should consider increasing their emphasis on LTBI-related research.

Indexed as

InternationalityBiomedical ResearchGlobal HealthHumansLatent TuberculosisPublicationsBibliometric analysisLatent tuberculosis infectionPreventionPublic healthResearch governanceTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID32183753
PMCPMC7079542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.