Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183751›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Acceptability and feasibility of testing for HIV infection at birth and linkage to care in rural and urban Zambia: a cross-sectional study.

Catherine G Sutcliffe, Jane N Mutanga, Nkumbula Moyo, Jessica L Schue, Mutinta Hamahuwa, Philip E Thuma, William J Moss

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine G SutcliffeJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, USA. csutcli1@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8512-8326
Jane N MutangaLivingstone Central Hospital, Livingstone, Zambia.
Nkumbula MoyoMacha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia.
Jessica L SchueJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mutinta HamahuwaMacha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia.
Philip E ThumaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, USA.
William J MossJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Implementation strategies for a new point-of-care test for early infant diagnosisR01AI116324 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MOSS, WILLIAM J · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01AI116324NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116324Thrasher Research Fund 12647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly infant diagnosis is important for timely identification of HIV-infected infants and linkage to care. Testing at birth has been implemented to facilitate earlier diagnosis of HIV infection but may present new challenges. This study was conducted to understand the acceptability and feasibility of birth testing in urban and rural settings in southern Zambia.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at 11 hospitals and clinics in Livingstone, Choma, and Macha in Southern Province, Zambia from 2016 to 2018. Infants born to pregnant women living with HIV at the sites were eligible for enrollment. After enrollment, a questionnaire was administered to the mother and a dried blood spot card was collected from infants for testing at a central laboratory. When results were available, mothers were notified to return to the clinic. Acceptability of birth testing was evaluated based on the proportion of women who agreed to participate and the reasons for non-participation among women who declined. Feasibility of testing at birth was evaluated using turnaround times for returning results, the proportion of women receiving results, and linkage to care for infants testing positive.

resultsOne thousand four hundred three women were approached for the study. A small proportion declined due to refusal of birth testing (0 to 8.2% across sites). One thousand two hundred ninety women agreed to have their infants tested. The proportion of mothers receiving results ranged from 51.6 to 92.1%, and was significantly lower at the hospital than clinics in Livingstone (51.6% vs. 69.8%; p < 0.0001) and Macha (69.5% vs. 85.7%; p < 0.0001) but not Choma (85.7% vs. 92.1%; p = 0.34). For mothers who received test results, the median turnaround time from sample collection was 67 days in Livingstone and 53 days in Macha and Choma. Overall, 23 (1.8%) infants tested positive for HIV but only 8 (34.8%) were linked to care a median of 68 days (range: 29, 784) after sample collection.

conclusionsWhile testing at birth was acceptable, this study highlights the operational challenges under a centralized laboratory testing system. Point-of-care platforms are needed for rapid testing and return of results so HIV-infected children can be identified, linked to care, and treated as early as possible.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesEarly DiagnosisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfant, NewbornMothersParturitionPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRural PopulationEarly infant diagnosisHIVLinkage to carePediatricsSub-Saharan AfricaZambia

Identifiers

PMID32183751
PMCPMC7079396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.