Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183744›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

What do women want? An analysis of preferences of women, involvement of men, and decision-making in maternal and newborn health care in rural Bangladesh.

Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman, Janet Perkins, Shumona Sharmin Salam, Shema Mhajabin, Aniqa Tasnim Hossain, Tapas Mazumder, Shams El Arifeen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sesotho Women's Preferences for Male Partner Involvement During Antenatal Care and Delivery.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed Ehsanur RahmanMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh. ehsanur@icddrb.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9216-1079
Janet PerkinsUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Shumona Sharmin SalamMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shema MhajabinMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Aniqa Tasnim HossainMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tapas MazumderMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shams El ArifeenMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo improve the utilization of maternal and newborn health (MNH) care and to improve the quality of care, the World Health Organization (WHO) has strongly recommended men's involvement in pregnancy, childbirth, and after birth. In this article, we examine women's preferences for men's involvement in MNH care in rural Bangladesh and how this compares to husbands' reported involvement by women.

methodsA cross-sectional household survey of 1367 women was administered in 2018 in the district of Brahmanbaria. Outcomes of interest included supporting self-care during pregnancy, participation in birth planning, presence during antenatal care, childbirth, and postnatal care, and participation in newborn care. Binary and multiple logistic regressions were done to understand the associations between the outcomes of interest and background characteristics.

resultsAlthough women preferred a high level of involvement of their husbands in MNH care, husbands' reported involvement varied across different categories of involvement. However, women's preferences were closely associated with husbands' reported involvement. Around three-quarters of the women reported having been the primary decision makers or reported that they made the decisions jointly with their husbands. The likelihood of women reporting their husbands were actively involved in MNH care was 2.89 times higher when the women preferred their husbands to be involved in 3-4 aspects of MNH care. The likelihood increased to 3.65 times when the women preferred their husbands to be involved in 5-6 aspects. Similarly, the likelihood of husbands' reported active involvement was 1.43 times higher when they jointly participated in 1-2 categories of decision-making. The likelihood increased to 2.02 times when they jointly participated in all three categories.

conclusionThe findings of our study suggest that women in rural Bangladesh do indeed desire to have their husbands involved in their care during pregnancy, birth and following birth. Moreover, their preferences were closely associated with husbands' reported involvement in MNH care; that is to say, when women wanted their husbands to be involved, they were more likely to do so. Programmes and initiatives should acknowledge this, recognizing the many ways in which men are already involved and further allow women's preferences to be realized by creating an enabling environment at home and in health facilities for husbands to participate in MNH care.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdolescentAdultBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfant CareInfant HealthInfant, NewbornMaternal HealthMaternal Health ServicesParturitionPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyMale involvementMaternal healthNewborn healthPregnant womenRespectful maternity careRights

Identifiers

PMID32183744
PMCPMC7079480
OpenAlexW3011502453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.