Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183722›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

MethylNet: an automated and modular deep learning approach for DNA methylation analysis.

Joshua J Levy, Alexander J Titus, Curtis L Petersen, Youdinghuan Chen, Lucas A Salas, Brock C Christensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua J LevyProgram in Quantitative Biomedical Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA. joshua.j.levy.gr@dartmouth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8050-1291
Alexander J TitusDepartment of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering, Washington, DC, USA.
Curtis L PetersenProgram in Quantitative Biomedical Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Youdinghuan ChenProgram in Quantitative Biomedical Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Lucas A SalasDepartment of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Brock C ChristensenDepartment of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Relation Between In-utero Vitamin D and Immune Function in Early Childhood P20GM104416 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CHRISTENSEN, BROCK CLARKE · 2013 to 2022
$23.7M
(PQ3) Immune epigenetic biomarkers of bladder cancer outcomesR01CA216265 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CHRISTENSEN, BROCK CLARKE · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
MicroRNA related genetic variation and head and neck cancerR01DE022772 · NIDCR · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CHRISTENSEN, BROCK CLARKE · 2013 to 2016
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216265NIH HHS 5R01CA216265-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA methylation (DNAm) is an epigenetic regulator of gene expression programs that can be altered by environmental exposures, aging, and in pathogenesis. Traditional analyses that associate DNAm alterations with phenotypes suffer from multiple hypothesis testing and multi-collinearity due to the high-dimensional, continuous, interacting and non-linear nature of the data. Deep learning analyses have shown much promise to study disease heterogeneity. DNAm deep learning approaches have not yet been formalized into user-friendly frameworks for execution, training, and interpreting models. Here, we describe MethylNet, a DNAm deep learning method that can construct embeddings, make predictions, generate new data, and uncover unknown heterogeneity with minimal user supervision.

resultsThe results of our experiments indicate that MethylNet can study cellular differences, grasp higher order information of cancer sub-types, estimate age and capture factors associated with smoking in concordance with known differences.

conclusionThe ability of MethylNet to capture nonlinear interactions presents an opportunity for further study of unknown disease, cellular heterogeneity and aging processes.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDNA MethylationUser-Computer InterfaceAgingCpG IslandsHumansNeoplasmsDeep learningDNA methylationEmbeddingHigh performance computingSupervisedTransfer learningUnsupervisedWorkflow automation

Identifiers

PMID32183722
PMCPMC7076991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.