Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183711›Full record

SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2020

The risk of dyspnea in patients treated with third-generation P2Y

Na Zhang, Weisen Xu, Ou Li, Bing Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antiplatelet Use in Ischemic Stroke.The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Na ZhangIntensive Care Unit, China Emergency General Hospital, 29 Xibahenanli, Beijing, 100028, China. zhangnabj@163.com.
Weisen XuDepartment of Stomatology, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.
Ou LiIntensive Care Unit, China Emergency General Hospital, 29 Xibahenanli, Beijing, 100028, China.
Bing ZhangIntensive Care Unit, China Emergency General Hospital, 29 Xibahenanli, Beijing, 100028, China.
Beijing Emergency Medical Center · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTicagrelor and prasugrel are two third-generation oral P2Y

methodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing ticagrelor or prasugrel with clopidogrel until July 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of dyspnea. The risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using meta-analysis.

resultsWe included 25 RCTs involving 63,484 patients in this meta-analysis, including 21 studies on ticagrelor and 4 studies on prasugrel. Compared to the clopidogrel group, third-generation oral P2Y

conclusionsTicagrelor has a higher risk of dyspnea than clopidogrel, which was not observed in patients using prasugrel.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClopidogrelDyspneaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochloridePurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochloridePurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsTicagrelorDrug side effectMeta-analysisPrasugrelTicagrelor

Identifiers

PMID32183711
PMCPMC7079377
OpenAlexW3012558900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.