Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183639›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2020

The role of mural mechanics on cephalopod palaeoecology.

Robert Lemanis, Deborah Stier, Igor Zlotnikov, Paul Zaslansky, Dirk Fuchs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert LemanisB CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Deborah StierB CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Igor ZlotnikovB CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Paul ZaslanskyDepartment for Restorative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dirk FuchsBayerische Staatssammlung für Paläntologie und Geologie, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cephalopods transformed the molluscan shell into a buoyancy device that must be strong enough to resist external water pressure. Historically, unique features of the shell have been interpreted on the basis that the strength of the shell presents a hard limit on maximum habitat depth. One such feature is the mural flap, which is a semi-prismatic layer deposited on the inner surface of some coleoid septa that has been suggested to strengthen the shell and permit colonization of deeper waters. We test this hypothesis by constructing finite-element models that show how mural modifications affect the response of the shell to hydrostatic pressure. The mural flaps are found to have no notable structural function. Another mural modification discovered here is the adapical ridge flap that initially seemed to have a potential function in shifting peak stress away from the attachment site of the septum; however, the irregular distribution of this feature casts any functional interpretation in doubt. Ecological separation of belemnites and decabrachians is likely not mediated by the presence/absence of mural flaps. This work illustrates a potential caveat that not all unique septal features formed in response to increasing hydrostatic pressure and deeper habitats.

Indexed as

CephalopodaAnimalselectron backscatter diffractionfinite-element analysismolluscsmural flapSpirulatomography

Identifiers

PMID32183639
PMCPMC7115233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.