Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183351›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Comparative Molecular Analysis of Cancer Behavior Cultured In Vitro, In Vivo, and Ex Vivo.

Nicholas R Hum, Aimy Sebastian, Sean F Gilmore, Wei He, Kelly A Martin, Aubree Hinckley, Karen R Dubbin, Monica L Moya, Elizabeth K Wheeler, Matthew A Coleman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Research progress on the chemical and pharmacological effects ofInternational journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Construction ofOncology letters · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas R HumPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1605-3193
Aimy SebastianPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7822-7040
Sean F GilmorePhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Wei HePhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2795-0324
Kelly A MartinPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Aubree HinckleyPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Karen R DubbinEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9495-4766
Monica L MoyaEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6714-1700
Elizabeth K WheelerEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Matthew A ColemanPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Gabriela G LootsPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9546-5561
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · US

Funding

LDRD 19-SI-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current pre-clinical models of cancer fail to recapitulate the cancer cell behavior in primary tumors primarily because of the lack of a deeper understanding of the effects that the microenvironment has on cancer cell phenotype. Transcriptomic profiling of 4T1 murine mammary carcinoma cells from 2D and 3D cultures, subcutaneous or orthotopic allografts (from immunocompetent or immunodeficient mice), as well as ex vivo tumoroids, revealed differences in molecular signatures including altered expression of genes involved in cell cycle progression, cell signaling and extracellular matrix remodeling. The 3D culture platforms had more in vivo-like transcriptional profiles than 2D cultures. In vivo tumors had more cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) while in vitro cultures had cells residing primarily in an epithelial or mesenchymal state. Ex vivo tumoroids incorporated aspects of in vivo and in vitro culturing, retaining higher abundance of cells undergoing EMT while shifting cancer cell fate towards a more mesenchymal state. Cellular heterogeneity surveyed by scRNA-seq revealed that ex vivo tumoroids, while rapidly expanding cancer and fibroblast populations, lose a significant proportion of immune components. This study emphasizes the need to improve in vitro culture systems and preserve syngeneic-like tumor composition by maintaining similar EMT heterogeneity as well as inclusion of stromal subpopulations.

Indexed as

4T1EMTmonolayer culturePDXRNA-seqsingle-cell RNA-seqspheroidsyngeneic cultureTNBCtumoroid

Identifiers

PMID32183351
PMCPMC7140030
OpenAlexW3011987747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.