ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Stochastic Selection of Activation Layers for Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Comparison of Different Convolutional Neural Network Activation Functions and Methods for Building Ensembles for Small to Midsize Medical Data Sets.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Postprocessing for Skin Detection.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the field of deep learning has achieved considerable success in pattern recognition, image segmentation, and many other classification fields. There are many studies and practical applications of deep learning on images, video, or text classification. Activation functions play a crucial role in discriminative capabilities of the deep neural networks and the design of new "static" or "dynamic" activation functions is an active area of research. The main difference between "static" and "dynamic" functions is that the first class of activations considers all the neurons and layers as identical, while the second class learns parameters of the activation function independently for each layer or even each neuron. Although the "dynamic" activation functions perform better in some applications, the increased number of trainable parameters requires more computational time and can lead to overfitting. In this work, we propose a mixture of "static" and "dynamic" activation functions, which are stochastically selected at each layer. Our idea for model design is based on a method for changing some layers along the lines of different functional blocks of the best performing CNN models, with the aim of designing new models to be used as stand-alone networks or as a component of an ensemble. We propose to replace each activation layer of a CNN (usually a ReLU layer) by a different activation function stochastically drawn from a set of activation functions: in this way, the resulting CNN has a different set of activation function layers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.