Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183303›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Climate Change as an Involuntary Exposure: A Comparative Risk Perception Study from Six Countries across the Global Development Gradient.

Meredith Gartin, Kelli L Larson, Alexandra Brewis, Rhian Stotts, Amber Wutich, Dave White, Margaret du Bray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meredith GartinSchool of Public Health, University of Alabama Birmingham, 1665 University Blvd., 310F Ryals Public Health Building, Birmingham, AL 35205-0022, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0062-4601
Kelli L LarsonSchool of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, PO Box 87537-5302, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6558-2687
Alexandra BrewisSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Rhian StottsSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Amber WutichSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Dave WhiteSchool of Community Resources and Development, Arizona State University 411 N. Central Ave., Ste. 550, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5518-1596
Margaret du BrayEnvironmental Studies, Augustana College, 639 38th Street, Rock Island, IL 61201, USA.
Arizona State University · USAlabama Department of Public Health · USAugustana College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change has been referred to as an involuntary exposure, meaning people do not voluntarily put themselves at risk for climate-related ill health or reduced standard of living. The purpose of this study is to examine people's risk perceptions and related beliefs regarding (1) the likelihood of different risks occurring at different times and places and (2) collective (government) responsibility and personal efficacy in dealing with climate change, as well as (3) explore the ways in which climate risk may be amplified when posed against individual health and well-being. Previous research on this topic has largely focused on one community or one nation state, and so a unique characteristic of this study is the comparison between six different city (country) sites by their development and national wealth. Here, we collected 401 surveys from Phoenix (USA), Brisbane (Australia), Wellington (New Zealand), Shanghai (China), Viti Levu (Fiji), and Mexico City (Mexico). Results suggest that the hyperopia effect characterized the sample from each study site but was more pronounced in developed sites, suggesting that the more developed sites employ a broader perspective when approaching ways to mitigate their risk against climate-related health and well-being impacts.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeRisk AssessmentAustraliaChinaFijiHumansMexicoNew ZealandUnited Statesclimate changecomparative researchglobal healthrisk perceptions

Identifiers

PMID32183303
PMCPMC7143123
OpenAlexW3011692046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.