ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Correlation betweenMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Iron Pill-Induced Gastritis in a Pediatric Patient Taking Ferrous Sulfate Tablets.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024Article
- Trend of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Childhood: A Single-Center Experience.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Pattern of Primary Resistance ofChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Antibiotic Resistance and Therapeutic Efficacy ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Correlations between Endoscopic and Histopathological Assessment ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Gastric mucosal precancerous lesions inWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Article
- Synergistic Therapies as a Promising Option for the Treatment of Antibiotic-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Diagnostic approach toAnnals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe management of MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective study was performed on consecutive paediatric patients, ranging from 0 to 18 years of age, who underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) for a period of 5 years, regardless of their symptomatology. Endoscopy reports and histological slides were reviewed and clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data were recorded.
resultsA total of 248 patients were included in the study, 82 (33.06%) of them being
conclusionEndoscopic features such as nodularity of the antral mucosa (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.