Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32183124›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial.

Angelo Zavattini, Alan Knight, Federico Foschi, Francesco Mannocci

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05266599 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Two Different Root Canal Sealers on Postobturation Pain in Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment: A Prospective Clinical Randomized Study- Part 1, Influence of Resin-based and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate-based Sealers on Treatment Outcome After Two-year Follow-up in Mandibular Molar Teeth With Asymptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis-Part 2

TypeinterventionalSponsorEge UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsAsymptomatic Vital Mandibular Molar TeethArmsMTA Fillapex root canal sealer, AH Plus root canal sealer
NCT05808062 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Different Canal Dryness Protocols on the Quality of Matched Single Cone Obturation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBritish University In EgyptRan2022 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsObturationArmsRoot canal obturation
NCT06400030 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of BioCeramic Sealer With Single Cone Technique on the Healing of Periapical Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamascus UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled41ConditionsPeriapical LesionsArmsRoot canal treatment with AH Plus sealer, Root canal treatment with BioCeramic sealer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angelo ZavattiniDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences. Floor 22 Tower Wing, Guy's Dental Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6176-2688
Alan KnightDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences. Floor 22 Tower Wing, Guy's Dental Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Federico FoschiDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences. Floor 22 Tower Wing, Guy's Dental Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6901-0280
Francesco MannocciDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences. Floor 22 Tower Wing, Guy's Dental Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.

Funding

Septodont, Saint Maur Des Fosses, France. 0000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the success rate of root canal treatments undertaken using a calcium silicate root canal sealer in combination with a single cone with non-calcium silicate cement and warm vertical condensation.

methods150 necrotic or pulpitic teeth were treated. (REC: 08/H0804/79). Following standardized root canal chemo-debridement. The canals were obturated using warm vertical condensation of gutta-percha and epoxy-based sealer (AH plus) or a calcium silicate sealer (BioRoot

resultsAt 1-year recall, 104 teeth were assessed (51 AH plus, 53 BioRoot

conclusionWithin the limitations of this non-randomized trial, a calcium silicate cement in combination with single cone resulted in a similar proportion of successful cases compared to warm vertical condensation and epoxy-based sealer.

Indexed as

biorootbiosilicate cementCBCThydraulic cementsroot canalsingle conewarm vertical condensation

Identifiers

PMID32183124
PMCPMC7141324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.