Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32182907›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Systematic Review on the Use of Wearable Body Sensors for Health Monitoring: A Qualitative Synthesis.

Annica Kristoffersson, Maria Lindén

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Alert burden when monitoring patients' vital signs continuously at home.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Health 4.0 in the medical sector: a narrative review.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annica KristofferssonSchool of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 722 20 Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4368-4751
Maria LindénSchool of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 722 20 Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1940-1747

Funding

Stiftelsen för Kunskaps- och Kompetensutveckling 20180158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of wearable body sensors for health monitoring is a quickly growing field with the potential of offering a reliable means for clinical and remote health management. This includes both real-time monitoring and health trend monitoring with the aim to detect/predict health deterioration and also to act as a prevention tool. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a qualitative synthesis of studies using wearable body sensors for health monitoring. The synthesis and analysis have pointed out a number of shortcomings in prior research. Major shortcomings are demonstrated by the majority of the studies adopting an observational research design, too small sample sizes, poorly presented, and/or non-representative participant demographics (i.e., age, gender, patient/healthy). These aspects need to be considered in future research work.

Indexed as

Monitoring, AmbulatoryWearable Electronic DevicesWireless TechnologyAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansInternet of ThingsMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicineYoung Adulthealth monitoringIoTphysical activity monitoringqualitative synthesisremote health managementresearch shortcomingssensor systemsuser demographywearable body sensors

Identifiers

PMID32182907
PMCPMC7085653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.