Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32182847›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Impact of Morphine Treatment on Infarct Size and Reperfusion Injury in Acute Reperfused ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Ingo Eitel, Juan Wang, Thomas Stiermaier, Georg Fuernau, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, Alexander Joost, Alexander Jobs, Moritz Meusel, Christian Blodau, Steffen Desch and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Role of δBulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ingo EitelUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6442-246X
Juan WangUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas StiermaierUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Georg FuernauUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3813-8772
Hans-Josef FeistritzerDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig-Heart Center, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Alexander JoostUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2206-7153
Alexander JobsDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig-Heart Center, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Moritz MeuselUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8473-3601
Christian BlodauUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Steffen DeschDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig-Heart Center, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Suzanne de Waha-ThieleUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Harald LangerUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig-Heart Center, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DELeipzig Heart Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current evidence regarding the effect of intravenous morphine administration on reperfusion injury and/or cardioprotection in patients with myocardial infarction is conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of morphine administration, on infarct size and reperfusion injury assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in a large multicenter ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population. In total, 734 STEMI patients reperfused by primary percutaneous coronary intervention <12 h after symptom onset underwent CMR imaging at eight centers for assessment of myocardial damage. Intravenous morphine administration was recorded in all patients. CMR was completed within one week after infarction using a standardized protocol. The clinical endpoint of the study was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 12 months after infarction. Intravenous morphine was administered in 61.8% (

Indexed as

CMRinfarct sizemorphinereperfusionST-elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID32182847
PMCPMC7141264
OpenAlexW3009361103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.