Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32182754›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Ginger and Its Derivatives as Promising Alternatives to Antibiotics in Poultry Feed.

Mohamed E Abd El-Hack, Mahmoud Alagawany, Hazem Shaheen, Dalia Samak, Sarah I Othman, Ahmed A Allam, Ayman E Taha, Asmaa F Khafaga, Muhammad Arif, Ali Osman and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Dietary Ginger (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohamed E Abd El-HackDepartment of Poultry, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2831-8534
Mahmoud AlagawanyDepartment of Poultry, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-8020-0971
Hazem ShaheenDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-5931-0466
Dalia SamakDepartment of Veterinary Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22511, Egypt.
Sarah I OthmanBiology Department, Faculty of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed A AllamDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Beni-suef University, Beni-suef 65211, Egypt.
Ayman E TahaDepartment of Animal Husbandry and Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Edfina 22578, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0429-2587
Asmaa F KhafagaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Edfina 22758, Egypt.
Muhammad ArifDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Punjab 40100, Pakistan.
Ali OsmanDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7174-0207
Ahmed I El SheikhDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, King Faisal University, Hofuf 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Shaaban S ElnesrDepartment of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum 63514, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-4430-1492
Mahmoud SitohyDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-6623-4860
Zagazig University · EGAlexandria University · EGDamanhour University · EGBeni-Suef University · EGFayoum University · EGKing Faisal University · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAUniversity of Sargodha · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry enterprises have sustained rapid development through the last three decennaries. For which reason, higher utilization of antibacterial, either as therapeutic or growth promoting agents, has been accepted. Owing to the concern of developing bacterial resistance among populations towards antibiotic generations, accumulation of antibacterial remaining's in chicken products and elevating shopper request for outcomes without antibacterial remaining's, looking for unconventional solutions that could exchange antibacterial without influencing productiveness or product characters. Using natural alternatives including ginger, garlic prebiotics, organic acids, plant extracts, etheric oils and immune stimulants have been applied to advance the performance, hold poultry productiveness, prevent and control the enteric pathogens and minimize the antibacterial utilization in the poultry production in recent years. The use of a single replacement or ideal assemblage of different choices besides good supervision and livestock welfare may play a basic role in maximizing benefits and preserving poultry productiveness. The object of this review was to support an outline of the recent knowledge on the use of the natural replacements (ginger and its derivatives) in poultry feed as feed additives and their effects on poultry performance, egg and meat quality, health as well as the economic efficiency.

Indexed as

birdsbody weightcarcass weightchemical compositionGingermicrobial effect

Identifiers

PMID32182754
PMCPMC7143490
OpenAlexW3010446020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.