Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32182662›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Comparison of the Level and Mechanisms of Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes, Carbon Nanofibers, and Silicon Nanotubes in Bioassay with Four Marine Microalgae.

Konstantin Pikula, Vladimir Chaika, Alexander Zakharenko, Zhanna Markina, Aleksey Vedyagin, Vladimir Kuznetsov, Alexander Gusev, Soojin Park, Kirill Golokhvast

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Enantioselective Toxic Effects of Prothioconazole towardMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in Nanotoxicology.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Konstantin PikulaFar Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova 8, 690950 Vladivostok, Russian.ORCID 0000-0002-3185-3335
Vladimir ChaikaFar Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova 8, 690950 Vladivostok, Russian.
Alexander ZakharenkoFar Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova 8, 690950 Vladivostok, Russian.
Zhanna MarkinaFar Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova 8, 690950 Vladivostok, Russian.
Aleksey VedyaginBoreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 5, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russian.ORCID 0000-0002-6930-936X
Vladimir KuznetsovBoreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 5, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russian.
Alexander GusevTambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin, Internatsionalnaya 33, 392000 Tambov, Russian.ORCID 0000-0002-8699-9112
Soojin ParkInha University, 100 Inharo, Nam-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea.
Kirill GolokhvastFar Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova 8, 690950 Vladivostok, Russian.
Far Eastern Federal University · RUBoreskov Institute of Catalysis · RUInha University · KRRussian Academy of Sciences · RUTambov State University · RU

Funding

Российский Фонд Фундаментальных Исследований (РФФИ) 19-05-50010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) have various applications in medicine, cosmetics, optics, catalysis, environmental purification, and other areas nowadays. With an increasing annual production of NPs, the risks of their harmful influence to the environment and human health is rising. Currently, our knowledge about the mechanisms of interaction between NPs and living organisms is limited. Additionally, poor understanding of how physical and chemical characteristic and different conditions influence the toxicity of NPs restrict our attempts to develop the standards and regulations which might allow us to maintain safe living conditions. The marine species and their habitat environment are under continuous stress due to anthropogenic activities which result in the appearance of NPs in the aquatic environment. Our study aimed to evaluate and compare biochemical effects caused by the influence of different types of carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, and silica nanotubes on four marine microalgae species. We evaluated the changes in growth-rate, esterase activity, membrane polarization, and size changes of microalgae cells using flow cytometry method. Our results demonstrated that toxic effects caused by the carbon nanotubes strongly correlated with the content of heavy metal impurities in the NPs. More hydrophobic carbon NPs with less ordered structure had a higher impact on the red microalgae

Indexed as

carbon nanotubesmicroalgaemode of actionnanofiberssilica nanotubestoxicity

Identifiers

PMID32182662
PMCPMC7153241
OpenAlexW3010385031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.