Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32182592›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020

An open source heterogeneous 3D printed mouse phantom utilising a novel bone representative thermoplastic.

Gareth Price, Emma R Biglin, Sean Collins, Adam Aitkinhead, Anna Subiel, Amy L Chadwick, David M Cullen, Karen J Kirkby, Giuseppe Schettino, Jill Tipping and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Production of heterogenous bone radiopacity phantom using 3D printing.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gareth PriceUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
Emma R BiglinUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
Sean CollinsNational Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, United Kingdom.
Adam AitkinheadUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
Anna SubielNational Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3467-4631
Amy L ChadwickUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
David M CullenSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Karen J KirkbyUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0901-210X
Giuseppe SchettinoNational Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, United Kingdom.
Jill TippingChristie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
Andrew RobinsonUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK C147/A18083Cancer Research UK C147/A25254Department of HealthNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/P00203X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of rigorous quality standards in pre-clinical radiation dosimetry has renewed interest in the development of anthropomorphic phantoms. Using 3D printing customisable phantoms can be created to assess all parts of pre-clinical radiation research: planning, image guidance and treatment delivery. We present the full methodology, including material development and printing designs, for the production of a high spatial resolution, anatomically realistic heterogeneous small animal phantom. A methodology for creating and validating tissue equivalent materials is presented. The technique is demonstrated through the development of a bone-equivalent material. This material is used together with a soft-tissue mimicking ABS plastic filament to reproduce the corresponding structure geometries captured from a CT scan of a nude mouse. Air gaps are used to represent the lungs. Phantom validation was performed through comparison of the geometry and x-ray attenuation of CT images of the phantom and animal images. A 6.6% difference in the attenuation of the bone-equivalent material compared to the reference standard in softer beams (0.5 mm Cu HVL) rapidly decreases as the beam is hardened. CT imaging shows accurate (sub-millimetre) reproduction of the skeleton (Distance-To-Agreement 0.5 mm ± 0.4 mm) and body surface (0.7 mm ± 0.5 mm). Histograms of the voxel intensity profile of the phantom demonstrate suitable similarity to those of both the original mouse image and that of a different animal. We present an approach for the efficient production of an anthropomorphic phantom suitable for the quality assurance of pre-clinical radiotherapy. Our design and full methodology are provided as open source to encourage the pre-clinical radiobiology community to adopt a common QA standard.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingPlasticsPrinting, Three-DimensionalTemperatureAnimalsBone and BonesMiceRadiometryTomography, X-Ray ComputedPlastics

Identifiers

PMID32182592
PMCPMC10606941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.