Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32181987›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2020

Engineered Biomaterial Platforms to Study Fibrosis.

Matthew D Davidson, Jason A Burdick, Rebecca G Wells

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A practical toolbox for modelling fibrosis in vitro.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Microengineered Gradient Hydrogels for Mechanobiology.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Dual optical elastography detectsJournal of biomedical optics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew D DavidsonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Jason A BurdickDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Rebecca G WellsDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6988-4102
University City Science Center · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Rebecca A Simmons · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Dynamic Fibrous Scaffolds for Repairing Dense Connective TissuesR01AR056624 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jason A Burdick, Robert L Mauck · 2009 to 2026
$7.5M
Pathological consequences of altered tissue mechanics in fibrosisR01EB017753 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JANMEY, PAUL A, SHENOY, VIVEK · 2014 to 2025
$6.3M
Tunable Synthetic ECMs for Investigating Stellate Cell Activation and MigrationF32DK117568 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIDSON, MATTHEW DAVID · 2018 to 2021
$223k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056624NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017753NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK117568NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many pathologic conditions lead to the development of tissue scarring and fibrosis, which are characterized by the accumulation of abnormal extracellular matrix (ECM) and changes in tissue mechanical properties. Cells within fibrotic tissues are exposed to dynamic microenvironments that may promote or prolong fibrosis, which makes it difficult to treat. Biomaterials have proved indispensable to better understand how cells sense their extracellular environment and are now being employed to study fibrosis in many tissues. As mechanical testing of tissues becomes more routine and biomaterial tools become more advanced, the impact of biophysical factors in fibrosis are beginning to be understood. Herein, fibrosis from a materials perspective is reviewed, including the role and mechanical properties of ECM components, the spatiotemporal mechanical changes that occur during fibrosis, current biomaterial systems to study fibrosis, and emerging biomaterial systems and tools that can further the understanding of fibrosis initiation and progression. This review concludes by highlighting considerations in promoting wide-spread use of biomaterials for fibrosis investigations and by suggesting future in vivo studies that it is hoped will inspire the development of even more advanced biomaterial systems.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsExtracellular MatrixFibrosisHumansBiocompatible Materialsbiomaterialsbiomaterial systemsextracellular matricesfibrosis studiesmechanobiology

Identifiers

PMID32181987
PMCPMC7274888
OpenAlexW3011291139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.