ArticleThe oncologist2020
Antibacterial Use Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Hematologic and Gastrointestinal Adverse Events in Patients Treated with Gemcitabine for Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer.
Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01442974 (Assessment Of Stromal Response To Nab-Paclitaxel In Combination With Gemcitabine In Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment Of Stromal Response To Nab-Paclitaxel In Combination With Gemcitabine In Pancreatic Cancer
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- De novo or Salvage? Nucleotide Availability as a Driver of Bacterial Adaptation and Virulence.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Decoding the microbial blueprint of pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Salecan Suppresses Pancreatic Cancer Progression by Promoting Necroptosis via the RIPK1/MLKL Pathway.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Risk comparison of adverse reactions between gemcitabine monotherapy and gemcitabine combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer: insights from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Role of the oral-gut microbiota axis in pancreatic cancer: a new perspective on tumor pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Characterisation of novelJournal of oral microbiology · 2025Article
- Intratumoral microorganisms in tumors of the digestive system.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
- Review
- Mechanisms by which the intestinal microbiota affects gastrointestinal tumours and therapeutic effects.Molecular biomedicine · 2023Review
- Intratumor microbiome: selective colonization in the tumor microenvironment and a vital regulator of tumor biology.MedComm · 2023Review
- Intratumour microbiome of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Review
- Role of microbiota and microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids in PDAC.Cancer medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Impact of microbiota-immunity axis in pancreatic cancer management.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Research Progress in Intestinal Microecology in Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of oncology · 2022Review
- The Microbiome in Pancreatic Cancer-Implications for Diagnosis and Precision Bacteriophage Therapy for This Low Survival Disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Association of the Microbiota and Pancreatic Cancer: Opportunities and Limitations.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Risk Factors for Infections, Antibiotic Therapy, and Its Impact on Cancer Therapy Outcomes for Patients with Solid Tumors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- In Reply.The oncologist · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byIn Reply.2021
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreclinical evidence has demonstrated that common intratumor bacteria metabolize the chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine. The significance of this bacterial metabolism pathway, relative to the known metabolic pathways by host enzymes, is not known. We hypothesized that bacterial metabolism is clinically significant and that "knockdown" by antibacterial therapy has the unintended effect of increasing the effective dose of gemcitabine, thereby increasing the risk for gemcitabine-associated toxicities. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe reanalyzed the comparator arm of the MPACT trial (NCT01442974), made available through Project Data Sphere, LLC (CEO Roundtable on Cancer's Life Sciences Consortium, Cary, NC; www.projectdatasphere.org). In this arm, 430 patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with gemcitabine. We used the Anderson-Gill survival model to compare the risk of developing an adverse event after antibacterial prescription with time unexposed to antibacterials. Adverse events of grade 3 and greater were considered at three levels of granularity: all aggregated into one endpoint, aggregated by class, and taken individually. Antibiotic exposures were analyzed in aggregate as well as by class.
resultsAntibacterial exposure was associated with an increased risk of adverse events (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.77; confidence interval [CI]: 1.46-2.14), any hematologic adverse event (HR: 1.64; CI: 1.26-2.13), and any gastrointestinal adverse event (HR: 2.14; CI: 1.12-4.10) but not a constitutional (HR: 1.33; CI: 0.611-2.90) or hepatologic adverse event (HR: 0.99; CI: 0.363-2.71). Among specific adverse events, antibacterial exposure was associated with an increased risk of anemia (HR: 3.16; CI: 1.59-6.27), thrombocytopenia (HR: 2.52; CI: 1.31-4.85), leukopenia (HR: 3.91; CI: 1.46-10.5), and neutropenia (HR: 1.53; CI: 1.07-2.17) but not any other specific adverse events.
conclusionAntibacterial exposure was associated with an increased risk of gemcitabine-associated, dose-limiting adverse events, including aggregate hematologic and gastrointestinal events, as well as four specific hematologic adverse events, suggesting that intratumor bacteria may be responsible for a clinically significant portion of gemcitabine metabolism. Alternative avenues of evidence will be necessary to confirm this preliminary finding and assess its generalizability. There is plentiful opportunity for similar analyses on other clinical trial data sets, where gemcitabine or other biomimetic small molecules were used. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patients treated with gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have an increased rate of gemcitabine-associated toxicity during and after antibiotic therapy. This observation is consistent with preclinical evidence that intratumor bacteria metabolize gemcitabine to an inactive form. Further research is needed to determine whether this observation merits any changes in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.