ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2020
Two Patterns of Interocular Delay Revealed by Spontaneous Motion-in-Depth Pulfrich Phenomenon in Amblyopes with Stereopsis.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Stereopsis Is Abnormal in Treated Anisometropic Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Intact Perceptual Interactions of Interocular Temporal Phase and Contrast Disparities in Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Integration of Visual Motion Signals in Reduced Visual Conditions.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Binocular Imbalance and Myopic Shift in Unoperated Eyes After Unilateral SMILE and tPRK.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Motion Misperception in Anisomyopia Before and After Optical Correction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Measuring the Interocular Delay and its Link to Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Spatial frequency channels depend on stimulus bandwidth in normal and amblyopic vision: an exploratory factor analysis.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Interocular Transfer: The Dichoptic Flash-Lag Effect in Controls and Amblyopes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Delayed Correction for Extrapolation in Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- The magnitude of monocular light attenuation required to elicit the Pulfrich illusion.Vision research · 2021Article
- The Flash-lag Effect in Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Interocular Differences in Spatial Frequency Influence the Pulfrich Effect.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To assess interocular delays in amblyopes with stereopsis and to evaluate the relationship between interocular delays and the clinical characteristics. Methods: Twenty amblyopes with stereopsis (median, 400 arcseconds) and 20 controls with normal or corrected to normal visual acuity (≤0 logMAR) and normal stereopsis (≤60 arcseconds) participated. Using a rotating cylinder defined by horizontally moving Gabor patches, we produced a spontaneous Pulfrich phenomenon in order to determine the interocular delays, that is, the interocular phase difference at which ambiguous motion in plane was perceived. Two spatial frequencies-a low (0.95 cycles/degree [c/d]) and a medium (2.85 c/d) spatial frequency-were tested. Results: The absolute interocular delays of the amblyopic group was significantly longer than that of the controls at both low or medium spatial frequencies (P < 0.01). However, the interocular delays was not always in favor of the fellow eye: 35% of the amblyopes (7/20) showed a faster processing of the amblyopic eye than that of the fellow eye at 0.95 c/d and 29.5% (5/17) at 2.85 c/d. No significant correlation was found between interocular delays and the clinical characteristics (e.g., age, treatment history, stereoacuity, and magnitude of anisometropia) in this amblyopic cohort. Conclusions: The interocular delays in amblyopes with stereopsis might result from either a faster or slower processing of the amblyopic eye relative to the fellow eye. This work provides important additional information for binocular processing of dynamic visual stimuli in amblyopia. However, the special role between this form of interocular delays and patients' clinical characteristics remains unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.