Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32181756›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2020

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination with a high-density microarray patch: Results from a randomized, controlled phase I clinical trial.

Angus H Forster, Katey Witham, Alexandra C I Depelsenaire, Margaret Veitch, James W Wells, Adam Wheatley, Melinda Pryor, Jason D Lickliter, Barbara Francis, Steve Rockman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Angus H ForsterVaxxas Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5363-2015
Katey WithamVaxxas Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Alexandra C I DepelsenaireVaxxas Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6743-0097
Margaret VeitchThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, TRI, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
James W WellsThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, TRI, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9618-6940
Adam WheatleyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5593-9387
Melinda Pryor360biolabs, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jason D LickliterNucleus Network Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Barbara FrancisAvance Clinical Pty Ltd, Thebarton, South Australia, Australia.
Steve RockmanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jesse BodleSeqirus Pty Ltd, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Peter TreasurePeter Treasure Statistical Services Ltd, Kings Lynn, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7277-0122
Julian HicklingWorking in Tandem Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6178-1953
Germain J P FernandoVaxxas Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3260-0548
The University of Queensland · AUVaxxas (Australia) · AUThe University of Melbourne · AURoyal Statistical Society · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Vaxxas high-density microarray patch (HD-MAP) consists of a high density of microprojections coated with vaccine for delivery into the skin. Microarray patches (MAPs) offer the possibility of improved vaccine thermostability as well as the potential to be safer, more acceptable, easier to use, and more cost-effective for the administration of vaccines than injection by needle and syringe (N&S). Here, we report a phase I trial using the Vaxxas HD-MAP to deliver a monovalent influenza vaccine that was to the best of our knowledge the first clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of lower doses of influenza vaccine delivered by MAPs. METHODS AND

findingsHD-MAPs were coated with a monovalent, split inactivated influenza virus vaccine containing A/Singapore/GP1908/2015 H1N1 haemagglutinin (HA). Between February 2018 and March 2018, 60 healthy adults (age 18-35 years) in Melbourne, Australia were enrolled into part A of the study and vaccinated with either: HD-MAPs delivering 15 μg of A/Singapore/GP1908/2015 H1N1 HA antigen (A-Sing) to the volar forearm (FA); uncoated HD-MAPs; intramuscular (IM) injection of commercially available quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) containing A/Singapore/GP1908/2015 H1N1 HA (15 μg/dose); or IM injection of H1N1 HA antigen (15 μg/dose). After 22 days' follow-up and assessment of the safety data, a further 150 healthy adults were enrolled and randomly assigned to 1 of 9 treatment groups. Participants (20 per group) were vaccinated with HD-MAPs delivering doses of 15, 10, 5, 2.5, or 0 μg of HA to the FA or 15 μg HA to the upper arm (UA), or IM injection of QIV. The primary objectives of the study were safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives were to assess the immunogenicity of the influenza vaccine delivered by HD-MAP. Primary and secondary objectives were assessed for up to 60 days post-vaccination. Clinical staff and participants were blind as to which HD-MAP treatment was administered and to administration of IM-QIV-15 or IM-A/Sing-15. All laboratory investigators were blind to treatment and participant allocation. Two further groups in part B (5 participants per group), not included in the main safety and immunological analysis, received HD-MAPs delivering 15 μg HA or uncoated HD-MAPs applied to the forearm. Biopsies were taken on days 1 and 4 for analysis of the cellular composition from the HD-MAP application sites. The vaccine coated onto HD-MAPs was antigenically stable when stored at 40°C for at least 12 months. HD-MAP vaccination was safe and well tolerated; any systemic or local adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate. Observed systemic AEs were mostly headache or myalgia, and local AEs were application-site reactions, usually erythema. HD-MAP administration of 2.5 μg HA induced haemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and microneutralisation (MN) titres that were not significantly different to those induced by 15 μg HA injected IM (IM-QIV-15). HD-MAP delivery resulted in enhanced humoral responses compared with IM injection with higher HAI geometric mean titres (GMTs) at day 8 in the MAP-UA-15 (GMT 242.5, 95% CI 133.2-441.5), MAP-FA-15 (GMT 218.6, 95% CI 111.9-427.0), and MAP-FA-10 (GMT 437.1, 95% CI 254.3-751.3) groups compared with IM-QIV-15 (GMT 82.8, 95% CI 42.4-161.8), p = 0.02, p = 0.04, p < 0.001 for MAP-UA-15, MAP-FA-15, and MAP-FA-10, respectively. Higher titres were also observed at day 22 in the MAP-FA-10 (GMT 485.0, 95% CI 301.5-780.2, p = 0.001) and MAP-UA-15 (367.6, 95% CI 197.9-682.7, p = 0.02) groups compared with the IM-QIV-15 group (GMT 139.3, 95% CI 79.3-244.5). Results from a panel of exploratory immunoassays (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, CD4+ T-cell cytokine production, memory B cell (MBC) activation, and recognition of non-vaccine strains) indicated that, overall, Vaxxas HD-MAP delivery induced immune responses that were similar to, or higher than, those induced by IM injection of QIV. The small group sizes and use of a monovalent influenza vaccine were limitations of the study.

conclusionsInfluenza vaccine coated onto the HD-MAP was stable stored at temperatures up to 40°C. Vaccination using the HD-MAP was safe and well tolerated and resulted in immune responses that were similar to or significantly enhanced compared with IM injection. Using the HD-MAP, a 2.5 μg dose (1/6 of the standard dose) induced HAI and MN titres similar to those induced by 15 μg HA injected IM.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR.org.au), trial ID 108 ACTRN12618000112268/U1111-1207-3550.

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineVaccinationAdministration, CutaneousAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralAustraliaCells, CulturedDrug StabilityFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesInjections, IntramuscularAfluriaAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID32181756
PMCPMC7077342
OpenAlexW2996669727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.