Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32181745›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

The Multiple Sclerosis Health Resource Utilization Survey (MS-HRS): Development and Validation Study.

Nils-Henning Ness, Rocco Haase, Raimar Kern, Dirk Schriefer, Benjamin Ettle, Christian Cornelissen, Katja Akguen, Tjalf Ziemssen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06485115 (The Effectiveness of Combining a Home-based Digital Motor Telerehabilitation Program With Conventional Therapy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06485115 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of Combining a Home-based Digital Motor Telerehabilitation Program With Conventional Therapy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: a Multicentre, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversita di VeronaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled78ConditionsProgressive Multiple SclerosisArmsDigital Telerehabilitation (Euleria Home), Conventional therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nils-Henning NessUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2365-8855
Rocco HaaseUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2465-4909
Raimar KernMedicalSyn GmbH, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9669-331X
Dirk SchrieferUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7524-7628
Benjamin EttleNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4093-2107
Christian CornelissenSiemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7983-657X
Katja AkguenUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1371-5032
Tjalf ZiemssenUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8799-8202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvey-based studies are frequently used to describe the economic impact of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, there is no validated health resource survey available, preventing comparison of study results and meaningful conclusions regarding the efficiency of long-term treatments.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop and validate a tablet- and paper-based MS health resource utilization survey.

methodsWe developed and validated the Multiple Sclerosis Health Resource Utilization Survey (MS-HRS), consisting of 24 cost items for paper and tablet users. Data for validation came from two large German observational studies. Survey practicability was assessed according to the response rate. Reliability was described using test-retest reliability as well as Guttman lambda. Construct validity was assessed as convergent and discriminant validity via correlations with associated patient-reported outcomes and known-group analyses.

resultsIn total, 2207 out of 2388 (response rate: 92.4%) patients completed the survey and were included to determine psychometric properties. The test-retest reliability had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.828 over a course of 3 months. Convergent validity analyses showed that total costs correlated positively with increased disability (r=0.411, P<.001). For discriminant validity, correlations of total costs with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication ranged from -0.006 (convenience) to -0.216 (effectiveness). The mean annual cost was €28,203 (SD €14,808) (US $39,203; SD US $20,583) with disease-modifying therapies.

conclusionsThe MS-HRS is a multilingual, reliable, valid, electronically available, and easy-to-administer questionnaire providing a holistic cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment of resource utilization in patients with MS.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth ResourcesHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisPsychometricsReproducibility of Resultsmultiple sclerosispatient-reported outcome measuresquestionnaire developmentresource utilizationvalidation

Identifiers

PMID32181745
PMCPMC7109610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.